Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Skeletal Muscle Gender Dimorphism from Proteomics
Published on: December 14, 2011
Sex-based differences in cardiovascular proteomic profiles and their associations with adverse outcomes in patients
Marie de Bakker1, Teun B Petersen1,2, K Martijn Akkerhuis1
1Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC Cardiovascular Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Room Na-316, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Insights
Sex differences exist in heart failure proteins, impacting risk prediction. Endothelin-1 and somatostatin show distinct prognostic value in men versus women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Proteomics
- Sex Differences in Medicine
Background:
- Limited research exists on sex-specific protein profiles in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Understanding these differences is crucial for personalized prognostication and understanding HFrEF pathophysiology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate sex-based differences in circulating protein levels in HFrEF patients.
- To determine if protein prognostic value for adverse outcomes varies between sexes.
Main Methods:
- A proteomic assay identified 1105 cardiovascular proteins in 382 HFrEF patients with serial blood sampling.
- Linear regression and Cox models analyzed sex differences in baseline protein levels and prognostic value.
Main Results:
- 55 proteins differed significantly at baseline between men and women.
- Female protein profiles related to extracellular matrix organization; male profiles to cell death regulation.
- Endothelin-1 and somatostatin showed sex-modified associations with primary endpoints.
Conclusions:
- Baseline protein profiles in HFrEF are sex-specific.
- Prognostic value of most circulating proteins is similar across sexes, with exceptions like endothelin-1 and somatostatin.
Background:
Studies focusing on sex differences in circulating proteins in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are scarce. Insight into sex-specific cardiovascular protein profiles and their associations with the risk of adverse outcomes may contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiological processes involved in HFrEF. Moreover, it could provide a basis for the use of circulating protein measurements for prognostication in women and men, wherein the most relevant protein measurements are applied in each of the sexes.
Methods:
In 382 patients with HFrEF, we performed tri-monthly blood sampling (median follow-up: 25 [13-31] months). We selected all baseline samples and two samples closest to the primary endpoint (PEP: composite of cardiovascular death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, and HF hospitalization) or censoring. We then applied an aptamer-based multiplex proteomic assay identifying 1105 proteins previously associated with cardiovascular disease. We used linear regression models and gene-enrichment analysis to study sex-based differences in baseline levels. We used time-dependent Cox models to study differences in the prognostic value of serially measured proteins. All models were adjusted for the MAGGIC HF mortality risk score and p-values for multiple testing.
Results:
In 104 women and 278 men (mean age 62 and 64 years, respectively) cumulative PEP incidence at 30 months was 25% and 35%, respectively. At baseline, 55 (5%) out of the 1105 proteins were significantly different between women and men. The female protein profile was most strongly associated with extracellular matrix organization, while the male profile was dominated by regulation of cell death. The association of endothelin-1 (Pinteraction < 0.001) and somatostatin (Pinteraction = 0.040) with the PEP was modified by sex, independent of clinical characteristics. Endothelin-1 was more strongly associated with the PEP in men (HR 2.62 [95%CI, 1.98, 3.46], p < 0.001) compared to women (1.14 [1.01, 1.29], p = 0.036). Somatostatin was positively associated with the PEP in men (1.23 [1.10, 1.38], p < 0.001), but inversely associated in women (0.33 [0.12, 0.93], p = 0.036).
Conclusion:
Baseline cardiovascular protein levels differ between women and men. However, the predictive value of repeatedly measured circulating proteins does not seem to differ except for endothelin-1 and somatostatin.
Related Concept Videos
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...

