Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 27, 2026

Busulfan as a Myelosuppressive Agent for Generating Stable High-level Bone Marrow Chimerism in Mice
Published on: April 1, 2015
Busulfan Interlaboratory Proficiency Testing Program Revealed Worldwide Errors in Drug Quantitation and Dose
Dina M Kweekel1,2, Jeannine S McCune3, Arjen M Punt4,5
1Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Accurate busulfan dosing is crucial for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes. A proficiency test revealed persistent inaccuracies in busulfan quantitation and dosing recommendations, highlighting the need for regulatory action.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
- Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT)
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Personalized busulfan dosing is key to improving clinical outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).
- Previous proficiency tests indicated significant inaccuracies in busulfan dose recommendations.
- An interlaboratory proficiency test program was established to assess busulfan quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dosing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of laboratories in busulfan quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations.
- To identify persistent challenges in achieving accurate busulfan plasma exposure targets.
- To inform potential regulatory or educational interventions for HCT centers.
Main Methods:
- A proficiency test scheme involving 5 rounds (2 rounds/year) with busulfan samples (low and high concentrations) and theoretical cases.
- Participating laboratories reported busulfan concentrations, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations.
- Descriptive statistics were used to assess accuracy within ±15% for concentrations and ±10% for plasma exposure.
Main Results:
- An average of 78% of busulfan concentration measurements were accurate across 41 participating laboratories.
- Area under the concentration-time curve calculations were accurate in 75%-80% of cases.
- Dose recommendations showed lower accuracy (60%-69%), with some laboratories consistently deviating from reference values.
Conclusions:
- The proficiency test highlights ongoing inaccuracies in busulfan quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations.
- Current educational efforts appear insufficient, suggesting a need for regulatory oversight.
- Mandatory participation in busulfan proficiency testing or use of specialized labs may be required for HCT centers.
More Related Videos
09:58Spatial Quantification of Drugs in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Lesions by Laser Capture Microdissection Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry LCM-LC/MS
Published on: April 18, 2018
08:54Validated LC-MS/MS Panel for Quantifying 11 Drug-Resistant TB Medications in Small Hair Samples
Published on: May 19, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Drug Concentrations: Measurements
Plasma —...
Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant