[Controversies between mental health and disability standards in Mexico]

There are controversies between the practice of psychiatry, current international standards and mental disorders or conditions with disabilities, framed in social care models. The objective of this work is to provide evidence and analyze the main gaps in mental health such as: the invisibility of some people with disabilities for the design of policies, legislation, or public programs; the predominance of the medical model, in which the substitution of decision-making in informed consent prevails, which violates the rights of legal personality, equality, freedom, security and respect for personal integrity, among others. This analysis highlights the importance of: a) integrating the legal provisions on health and disability to international standards, and complying with the Human Rights framework of the Political Constitution of the United States of Mexico, especially the pro personae principle and to the conforming interpretation clause; b) reform the General Health Law in matters of mental health and general health, in order to change the paradigm of asylum care to move towards that of community care with a focus on primary health care, adjacent to the services of the National System of Health; c) prohibit the institutionalization of people with mental disorders, as well as coercive measures as containment measures, and instead train and encourage verbal de-escalation techniques.