Multi-omics integration analysis of GPCRs in pan-cancer to uncover inter-omics relationships and potential driver

Shiqi Li1, Xin Chen1, Jianfang Chen1

  • 1College of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China.

Insights

This study integrates multi-omics data to identify cancer-related G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Combining multi-staged and deep learning approaches reveals 165 common GPCRs, highlighting their immune-related roles in cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest drug target family, yet their role in cancer therapy remains underexplored due to limited understanding of their cancer associations.
  • Investigating GPCRs in cancer using multi-omics data is crucial, but integrating complex datasets presents significant challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively characterize GPCRs in 33 cancer types by integrating multi-omics data, including somatic mutations, copy number alterations, DNA methylation, and mRNA expression.
  • To identify novel cancer-related GPCRs by employing and comparing two distinct data integration strategies: multi-staged and meta-dimensional approaches.
  • To explore the immune-related functions of GPCRs in the context of cancer.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a multi-staged integration strategy to analyze correlations between GPCR mutations, somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), DNA methylation, and mRNA expression.
  • Utilized deep learning models for a meta-dimensional integration analysis to predict potential oncogenic GPCRs.
  • Compared and contrasted findings from both integration strategies to identify common and unique cancer-related GPCRs.

Main Results:

  • GPCR mutations poorly predicted expression dysregulation; SCNA-expression correlations were mostly positive, while methylation-expression and methylation-SCNA correlations were predominantly negative.
  • Identified 32 GPCRs linked to aberrant SCNAs and 144 GPCRs linked to aberrant methylation.
  • Deep learning predicted over 100 GPCRs as potential oncogenes. A total of 165 GPCRs were consistently identified by both integration strategies, while 172 were unique to one strategy.
  • GPCRs, particularly class A and adhesion receptors, exhibit significant immune-related associations.

Conclusions:

  • The integration of multi-omics data is essential for a comprehensive understanding of GPCRs in cancer.
  • Both multi-staged and meta-dimensional integration strategies are valuable and complementary for identifying cancer-related GPCRs.
  • The identified GPCRs, especially the 165 common ones, represent promising candidates for future cancer therapy research and warrant further investigation into their immune-related functions.