Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Identifying distinct clinical clusters in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction
Claartje Meijs1, Jasper J Brugts2, Lars H Lund3
1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Computational Biology, Neuherberg, Germany.
This study identified six distinct patient clusters within heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), revealing significant differences in mortality and hospitalization risks among these groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Research
- Data Science
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) is a complex condition with diverse patient profiles.
- Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is a recently defined category (EF 41-49%).
- Patient heterogeneity poses challenges for clinical trials and prognostication.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify distinct patient clusters within the HFmrEF population.
- To compare the prognostic implications of these identified clusters.
- To assess the utility of cluster analysis for HFmrEF stratification.
Main Methods:
- Latent class analysis was employed to cluster HFmrEF patients from the Swedish HF registry (n=7316).
- Clusters were validated using the CHECK-HF registry (n=1536).
- Cox proportional hazard models and Fine-Gray sub-distribution models were used to compare mortality and hospitalization risks across clusters, adjusting for age and sex.
Main Results:
- Six robust clusters were identified with varying prevalence: low-comorbidity (17%), ischaemic-male (13%), atrial fibrillation (20%), device/wide QRS (9%), metabolic (19%), and cardio-renal phenotype (22%).
- Significant differences in mortality and hospitalization were observed between clusters.
- The device/wide QRS, metabolic, and cardio-renal phenotype clusters exhibited substantially higher hazard ratios for adverse outcomes compared to the low-comorbidity reference cluster.
Conclusions:
- Robust and clinically meaningful clusters were identified in HFmrEF patients.
- These clusters demonstrate differential prognosis regarding mortality and hospitalization.
- The developed clustering model shows promise as a tool for clinical differentiation and prognostic assessment in HFmrEF, aiding clinical trial design.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions

