Validation of a multi-analyte immunoassay for distinguishing bacterial vs. viral infections in a pediatric cohort

Anil K Chokkalla1, Estella Tam2, Rommel Liang2

  • 1Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Pathology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

Abstract

Insights

The MeMed-BV test accurately distinguishes viral and bacterial infections in children. This host-protein based immunoassay showed high sensitivity and specificity, outperforming traditional biomarkers.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical diagnostics
  • Infectious disease research
  • Biomarker analysis

Background:

  • Distinguishing viral from bacterial infections is challenging due to overlapping symptoms.
  • Accurate pathogen identification is crucial for effective treatment.
  • The MeMed-BV test, an FDA-cleared multivariate index assay, uses host protein expression to differentiate infection types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the MeMed-BV immunoassay on the MeMed Key analyzer in a pediatric hospital setting.
  • To assess the analytical and clinical performance of the MeMed-BV test according to CLSI guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical performance was evaluated through precision, method comparison, and interference studies.
  • Clinical performance was assessed using a retrospective cohort study of 60 pediatric patients with acute febrile illness.
  • Plasma samples were analyzed using the MeMed-BV test on the MeMed Key analyzer.

Main Results:

  • The MeMed-BV test demonstrated acceptable precision (intra- and inter-assay) within <3 score units.
  • Diagnostic accuracy showed 94% sensitivity and 88% specificity for bacterial infections or co-infections.
  • The assay showed excellent agreement with manufacturer data (R=0.998) and outperformed WBC, PCT, and CRP in classifying bacterial infections.

Conclusions:

  • The MeMed-BV immunoassay exhibits reliable analytical performance for differentiating viral and bacterial infections in pediatric patients.
  • Further research is needed to confirm its clinical utility in reducing blood cultures and treatment times.