Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality control and quality assurance.

R H Laessig, S S Ehrmeyer, D J Hassemer

    Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
    |June 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary

    This article explains the importance of quality assurance in physician office laboratories. It outlines seven key components of a quality assurance program, including procedure manuals, record-keeping, and quality control charts. The article also emphasizes the role of vendor support in maintaining program effectiveness. If vendors cannot provide adequate assistance, the article suggests considering alternative suppliers. Additionally, resources such as professional organizations and consultants are proposed as valuable in program development. The authors suggest that these programs ensure reliable diagnostic outcomes and compliance with regulatory standards.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Electronic "Quality Control" (EQC): is it just for unit use devices?

    Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry·2001
    Same author

    Early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis through neonatal screening prevents severe malnutrition and improves long-term growth. Wisconsin Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening Study Group.

    Pediatrics·2001
    Same author

    Effect of legislation (CLIA'88) on setting quality specifications for US laboratories.

    Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation·2000
    Same author

    The laboratory-clinical interface: point-of-care testing.

    Chest·1999
    Same author

    Application of the Department of Health and Human Services proposed waived status requirements for in vitro diagnostic testing devices: case study.

    Clinical chemistry·1997
    Same author

    Point-of-care testing technology. Is quality control still relevant?

    MLO: medical laboratory observer·1997

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical laboratory science
    • Medical quality assurance
    • Healthcare regulatory compliance

    Background:

    Ensuring accurate diagnostic outcomes remains a central challenge in clinical settings. While physician office laboratories perform essential testing, maintaining consistency and reliability has proven difficult. Prior research has shown that quality assurance frameworks can reduce variability in results. However, gaps remain in how these programs are implemented in smaller clinical environments. No prior work had resolved how to standardize practices across decentralized testing sites. That uncertainty drove the need for clearer guidelines on quality control measures. This gap motivated the exploration of core components for effective assurance programs. No prior work had resolved how to integrate vendor support into quality assurance planning. This gap motivated the discussion of external resources for program development.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim of this article is to outline essential quality assurance practices for physician office laboratories. The specific problem is the lack of standardized protocols in small clinical testing environments. Motivation comes from the need to ensure reliable diagnostic results for patient care. The researchers propose that structured programs can improve laboratory outcomes. No prior work had resolved how to implement these programs effectively. This study addresses that gap by identifying key program components. The researchers propose that these components should be universally adopted. No prior work had resolved how to handle vendor support in these programs.

    Keywords:
    Clinical laboratory qualityOffice laboratory protocolsQuality control chartsMedical diagnostic standards

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The article outlines seven components: procedure manuals, record-keeping, maintenance logs, quality control charts, proficiency testing, laboratory inspection, and written protocols.

    The researchers propose that vendors can provide calibration, control development, and troubleshooting assistance essential for program success.

    The article suggests considering alternative vendors to ensure instrumentation and reagent reliability.

    Quality control charts help monitor system performance and ensure test results remain reliable.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Methods:

    The article reviews existing quality assurance frameworks for clinical laboratories. It examines procedure manuals and record-keeping as foundational elements. Maintenance logs and quality control charts are discussed as monitoring tools. Proficiency testing and laboratory inspections are highlighted as regulatory requirements. The authors analyze how these components ensure consistent testing outcomes. No prior work had resolved how to integrate these elements into a cohesive program. The researchers propose that these components should be combined systematically. No prior work had resolved how to leverage vendor support for program success.

    Main Results:

    The article identifies seven core components of a quality assurance program. These include procedure manuals, record-keeping, and maintenance logs. Quality control charts and proficiency testing are also emphasized. Laboratory inspection is proposed as a regulatory compliance measure. The authors suggest that these components ensure reliable testing outcomes. No prior work had resolved how to implement these components effectively. The researchers propose that vendor support is essential for program success. No prior work had resolved how to integrate external resources into these programs.

    Conclusions:

    The authors propose that a comprehensive quality assurance program is essential for physician office laboratories. They suggest that standardized protocols ensure reliable diagnostic outcomes. No prior work had resolved how to implement these programs effectively. The researchers propose that vendor support is crucial for program success. They suggest that alternative vendors should be considered if support is inadequate. No prior work had resolved how to integrate external resources into these programs. The authors propose that professional organizations and consultants can aid program development. They suggest that these resources should be considered for comprehensive program design.

    The authors propose that professional organizations can provide resources and guidance for program implementation.

    The article suggests that programs ensure reliable results, proper system function, and compliance with protocols.