Detection of novel therapies using a multi-national, multi-institutional registry of cutaneous immune-related adverse

Rohan Mital1,2, Tracey S Otto3,4, Andrei Savu1

  • 1The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA.

Abstract

Insights

This study highlights novel and effective treatments for cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. A multi-institutional registry demonstrated feasibility and identified targeted therapies improving cirAEs with no serious adverse events.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Oncology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are common side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy.
  • Current treatment guidelines for cirAEs are poorly defined and lack robust safety data.
  • Existing treatment algorithms often rely on limited case reports and may be subject to publication bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a multi-institutional registry for collecting data on cirAEs and their management.
  • To identify and evaluate targeted treatment strategies for various cirAE morphologies.
  • To assess the feasibility and utility of a collaborative approach to cirAE management.

Main Methods:

  • A registry was established using a standardized REDCap form.
  • Data were collected from 13 institutions, documenting 97 cases of cirAEs.
  • Dermatologists distributed the data collection form via email listservs.

Main Results:

  • Topical and systemic steroids were frequently used, but targeted therapies matched to disease presentation were also identified.
  • Novel treatments like tacrolimus for follicular, bullous, and eczematous eruptions, and phototherapy for eczematous eruptions were documented.
  • Effective use of dupilumab and rituximab for bullous eruptions, phototherapy for lichenoid/psoriasiform eruptions, and acitretin for psoriasiform eruptions were observed.
  • Targeted therapeutics, including dupilumab, rituximab, and psoriasis biologics, led to significant grade improvement (≥2) in all treated patients.
  • No serious adverse events were reported during the study.

Conclusions:

  • A multi-institutional registry for cirAEs and their management is feasible and valuable.
  • Collected data can effectively identify, evaluate, and assess targeted treatments for cirAEs.
  • Further registry expansion to include treatment progression can inform specific treatment recommendations for cirAEs.