Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Targeting Neuronal Fiber Tracts for Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy Using Interactive, Patient-Specific Models
Published on: August 12, 2018
An updated overview of recent and ongoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) trials in patients with dementia: a systematic
Giulia Remoli1,2, Leonardo Tariciotti3,4, Luigi Gianmaria Remore5,6
1Neurology Section, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMI), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Background:
Dementia affects more than 55 million people worldwide. Several technologies have been developed to slow cognitive decline: deep brain stimulation (DBS) of network targets in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) have been recently investigated.
Objective:
This study aimed to review the characteristics of the populations, protocols, and outcomes of patients with dementia enrolled in clinical trials investigating the feasibility and efficacy of DBS.
Materials And Methods:
A systematic search of all registered RCTs was performed on Clinicaltrials.gov and EudraCT, while a systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and APA PsycInfo to identify published trials.
Results:
The literature search yielded 2122 records, and the clinical trial search 15 records. Overall, 17 studies were included. Two of 17 studies were open-label studies reporting no NCT/EUCT code and were analysed separately. Of 12 studies investigating the role of DBS in AD, we included 5 published RCTs, 2 unregistered open-label (OL) studies, 3 recruiting studies, and 2 unpublished trials with no evidence of completion. The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate-high. Our review showed significant heterogeneity in the recruited populations regarding age, disease severity, informed consent availability, inclusion, and exclusion criteria. Notably, the standard mean of overall severe adverse events was moderately high (SAEs: 9.10 ± 7.10%).
Conclusion:
The population investigated is small and heterogeneous, published results from clinical trials are under-represented, severe adverse events not negligible, and cognitive outcomes uncertain. Overall, the validity of these studies requires confirmation based on forthcoming higher-quality clinical trials.
More Related Videos
08:25Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
Published on: May 19, 2016
12:26An Invasive Method for the Activation of the Mouse Dentate Gyrus by High-frequency Stimulation
Published on: June 2, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Treatment
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...