A meta-analysis: retrograde intrarenal surgery vs. percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children
Yi Yuan1, Yan-Nei Liang1, Kai-Feng Li1
1Department of Pediatric Urology Surgery, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Guangzhou, China.
Insights
Micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (micro-PCNL) shows superior outcomes for pediatric kidney stones compared to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), including higher stone-free rates and fewer complications. Further research is needed to fully illustrate efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Nephrolithiasis Management
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Pediatric kidney stones are increasing globally.
- Minimally invasive lithotripsy, including retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), is frequently used.
- The comparative safety and efficacy of RIRS and PCNL in children remain debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a meta-analysis comparing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for pediatric kidney stones.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of micro-PCNL versus other minimally invasive techniques.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library.
- Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers.
- Therapeutic effects were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.
Main Results:
- Thirteen studies with 1,019 pediatric patients were included.
- Micro-PCNL demonstrated a significantly higher stone-free rate (P=0.003) and lower postoperative fever (P=0.02) and Clavien-Dindo II complications (P=0.05).
- While operation time for mini-PCNL was longer than RIRS (P<0.00001), micro-PCNL showed a higher probability of Clavien-Dindo I and II complications than RIRS.
Conclusions:
- Micro-PCNL may be a preferred therapeutic option for pediatric kidney stones over RIRS.
- Further analysis of additional parameters is recommended due to limited case numbers in the study.
- The study highlights the need for comprehensive data to fully assess minimally invasive surgery efficacy in pediatric nephrolithiasis.
Backgrounds:
The increasing prevalence of pediatric kidney stones worldwide makes minimally invasive lithotripsy like retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) more prevalent. However, their safety and efficacy are controversial. Consequently, a meta-analysis of the comparison between RIRS and PCNL is conducted.
Methods:
Clinical trials were selected from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. The data extraction and study quality assessment were performed by two individuals independently. The data relating to therapeutic effects were extracted and analyzed by Review manager 5.4.
Results:
Thirteen studies involving 1,019 patients were included. The micro-PCNL excelled in stone-free rate (P = 0.003), postoperative fever rate (P = 0.02), and Clavien-Dindo II complications (P = 0.05). Notably, the mean age of the micro-PCNL group was younger than other groups (P = 0.0005). The operation time in mini-PCNL was longer than RIRS (P < 0.00001) but with high heterogeneity (I2 = 99%). There was no difference in Clavien-Dindo I, II, and III complications between the PCNL and the RIRS, but mini-PCNL showed a higher probability than RIRS in Clavien-Dindo I (P = 0.0008) and II complications (P = 0.007).
Conclusions:
Compared with RIRS, micro-PCNL could be a better therapeutic option for kidney stones in children. Of note, more parameters should be analyzed to illustrate the efficacy of different minimally invasive surgeries for pediatric kidney stones due to poor cases in our study.
Systematic Review Registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, PROSPERO CRD42022323611.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management


