Augmenting Quality Assurance Measures in Treatment Review with Machine Learning in Radiation Oncology
Malvika Pillai1, John W Shumway2, Karthik Adapa1,2
1Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Purpose:
Pretreatment quality assurance (QA) of treatment plans often requires a high cognitive workload and considerable time expenditure. This study explores the use of machine learning to classify pretreatment chart check QA for a given radiation plan as difficult or less difficult, thereby alerting the physicists to increase scrutiny on difficult plans.
Methods And Materials:
Pretreatment QA data were collected for 973 cases between July 2018 and October 2020. The outcome variable, a degree of difficulty, was collected as a subjective rating by physicists who performed the pretreatment chart checks. Potential features were identified based on clinical relevance, contribution to plan complexity, and QA metrics. Five machine learning models were developed: support vector machine, random forest classifier, adaboost classifier, decision tree classifier, and neural network. These were incorporated into a voting classifier, where at least 2 algorithms needed to predict a case as difficult for it to be classified as such. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate feature importance.
Results:
The voting classifier achieved an overall accuracy of 77.4% on the test set, with 76.5% accuracy on difficult cases and 78.4% accuracy on less difficult cases. Sensitivity analysis showed features associated with plan complexity (number of fractions, dose per monitor unit, number of planning structures, and number of image sets) and clinical relevance (patient age) were sensitive across at least 3 algorithms.
Conclusions:
This approach can be used to equitably allocate plans to physicists rather than randomly allocate them, potentially improving pretreatment chart check effectiveness by reducing errors propagating downstream.
