Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Competition02:34

Competition

21.9K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.9K
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

16.5K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.5K
Ecological Niches02:02

Ecological Niches

23.9K
All organisms have a position within an ecosystem. The complete set of living and nonliving factors—including food resources, climate, and terrain—that define the position of a given organism are collectively referred to as the organism’s ecological niche.
23.9K
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

29.1K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
29.1K
Energy Budgets00:51

Energy Budgets

9.5K
Organisms must balance energy intake with the energy required for growth, maintenance and reproduction. These trade-offs result in a variety of survivorship and reproductive strategies, including semelparity and iteroparity. Semelparous species, like annual plants, have only one reproductive episode in their lifetimes and consequently have short lifespans. Iteroparous species, by contrast, have many reproductive events during their lifetimes but have relatively few offspring. These two...
9.5K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

120
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
120

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiple Protein-Protein Interactions Drive the Assembly and Budding of the Chikungunya Virion.

ACS infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Cooperative effect of local active stresses on the macroscopic contractility of elastic fiber networks.

Soft matter·2026
Same author

Clustering of SARS-CoV-2 membrane proteins in lipid bilayer membranes.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Membrane-bound cargo carried by teams of motors with heterogeneous velocities goes faster and further.

Biophysical journal·2026
Same author

Sensing the shape of a surface by tightly surface-bound filaments.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Sensing the shape of a surface by intracellular filaments.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

An integrative model of FGF2-induced signaling and muscle cell proliferation.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

A Hybrid Reaction-Diffusion and Mechanical Stimulus Model for Mandibular Bone Remodeling under Chewing and Vibratory Loading.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Integrated tick management strategies in fragmented peridomestic environments.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Joint likelihood-free inference of the number of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms and their selection coefficients in an evolving population.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Misspecification of the generation time distribution and its impact on R<sub>t</sub> estimates in structured populations.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Stability-driven assembly meets Prigoginian informational dissipation. A mean-field ODE comment of entropy reduction and emergent proto-self.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 29, 2025

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

287

Optimal foraging strategies for mutually avoiding competitors.

Farnaz Golnaraghi1, David A Quint2, Ajay Gopinathan1

  • 1Department of Physics, University of California - Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, 95343, CA, USA.

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|May 19, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Animal foraging patterns often follow Lévy distributions. Competition and avoidance behavior in multiple foragers can alter optimal search strategies, sometimes leading to different Lévy exponents than observed in solitary foraging.

Keywords:
ForagingLévy flightTerritorial animals

More Related Videos

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
07:26

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

9.4K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 29, 2025

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

287
Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae
07:26

Foraging Path-length Protocol for Drosophila melanogaster Larvae

Published on: April 23, 2016

9.4K
Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Mathematical Biology

Background:

  • Many animals utilize Lévy distributions for foraging movements.
  • Solitary foragers have optimal Lévy exponents under specific resource conditions.
  • Competitive interactions and avoidance behavior are common in natural foraging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how competition and avoidance affect foraging efficiency and optimal search strategies.
  • To model competitive foraging using a stochastic agent-based simulation.
  • To determine the impact of territory size and number of agents on foraging behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a stochastic agent-based simulation.
  • Incorporated an avoidance zone (territory) for each forager.
  • Analyzed foraging efficiency across varying Lévy exponents, territory sizes, and numbers of agents.

Main Results:

  • For non-destructive foraging, optimal Lévy exponent remains ~2, but efficiency decreases with more competitors/larger territories.
  • Increasing territory size can enhance efficiency at low Lévy exponents.
  • Destructive foraging with avoidance can yield an optimal Lévy exponent between 1 and 2.
  • Efficiency variance increases with the Lévy exponent.

Conclusions:

  • Mutual avoidance and efficiency variance influence optimal Lévy search exponents in multi-forager systems.
  • Competitive foraging dynamics can lead to different optimal strategies compared to solitary foraging.
  • Reducing efficiency variance may favor lower Lévy exponents in foraging.