Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
Published on: October 21, 2022
A machine learning-based algorithm for estimating the original corneal curvature based on corneal topography after
Yujing Li1, Heng Zhao2, Yuzhuo Fan2
1Department of Ophthalmology & Clinical Centre of Optometry, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China; Eye Disease and Optometry Institute, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China; College of Optemetry, Peking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of the Diagnosis and Therapy of Retinal and Choroid Diseases, Beijing, China.
Objective:
To estimate the original corneal curvature after orthokeratology by applying a machine learning-based algorithm.
Methods:
A total of 497 right eyes of 497 patients undergoing overnight orthokeratology for myopia for more than 1 year were enrolled in this retrospective study. All patients were fitted with lenses from Paragon CRT. Corneal topography was obtained by a Sirius corneal topography system (CSO, Italy). Original flat K (K1) and original steep K (K2) were set as the targets of calculation. The importance of each variable was explored by Fisher's criterion. Two machine learning models were established to allow adaptation to more situations. Bagging Tree, Gaussian process, support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree were used for prediction.
Results:
K2 after one year of orthokeratology (K2after) was most important in the prediction of K1 and K2. Bagging Tree performed best in both models 1 and 2 for K1 prediction (R = 0.812, RMSE = 0.855 in model 1 and R = 0.812, RMSE = 0.858 in model 2) and K2 prediction (R = 0.831, RMSE = 0.898 in model 1 and R = 0.837, RMSE = 0.888 in model 2). In model 1, the difference was 0.006 ± 1.34 D (p = 0.93) between the predictive value of K1 and the true value of K1 (K1before) and was 0.005 ± 1.51 D(p = 0.94) between the predictive value of K2 and the true value of K2 (K2before). In model 2, the difference was -0.056 ± 1.75 D (p = 0.59) between the predictive value of K1 and K1before and was 0.017 ± 2.01 D(p = 0.88) between the predictive value of K2 and K2before.
Conclusion:
Bagging Tree performed best in predicting K1 and K2. Machine learning can be applied to predict the corneal curvature for those who cannot provide the initial corneal parameters in the outpatient clinic, providing a relatively certain degree of reference for the refitting of the Ortho-k lenses.
More Related Videos
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
07:29Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015