Parental Factors Associated With Recovery After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review

While parental factors have been shown to potentially influence recovery after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in children, both the strength and direction of the relationships remain unclear. We performed a systematic review regarding the association between parental factors and recovery after mTBI. PubMed, CINHL, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Central, and Cochrane databases were queried for articles published between September 1, 1970, and September 10, 2022, reporting any parental factor and its association with recovery after mTBI in children younger than 18 years old. The review included both quantitative and qualitative studies published in English. Regarding the directionality of the association, only studies that assessed the effects of parental factors on recovery after mTBI were included. Study quality was assessed using a five-domain scale created by the Cochrane Handbook and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022361609). Of 2050 studies queried, 40 met inclusion criteria, and 38 of 40 studies used quantitative outcome measures. Across 38 studies, 24 unique parental factors and 20 different measures of recovery were identified. The most common parental factors studied were socioeconomic status/income (SES; n = 16 studies), parental stress/distress (n = 11), parental level of education (n = 9), pre-injury family functioning (n = 8), and parental anxiety (n = 6). Among all associations between parental factors and recovery reported, having a family history of a neurologic disease (i.e., migraine, epilepsy, neurodegenerative disease; 5/6 significant associations reported, 83%), parental stress/distress (9/11, 82%), parental anxiety (4/6, 67%), parental level of education (5/9, 56%), and SES/income (11/19, 57.9%) were shown to have the strongest evidence reporting significant associations with recovery, while a family history of psychiatric disease (3/6, 50%) and pre-injury family functioning (4/9, 44%) showed mixed results. Evidence regarding other parental factors including parental sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, parental history of concussion, family litigation status, family adjustment levels, and family psychosocial adversity were limited, as studies investigating such factors were few. The current review highlights literature describing several parental factors that significantly influence recovery from mTBI. It will likely be useful for future studies to incorporate parental SES, education, stress/distress, anxiety, quality of parent-child relationships, and parenting style when examining modifying factors in recovery after mTBI. Future studies should also consider how parental factors may serve as potential interventions or policy levers to optimize sport concussion-related policy and return-to-play guidelines.