Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

06:27
Assaying Predatory Feeding Behaviors in Pristionchus and Other Nematodes
Published on: September 4, 2016
9.9K
Using natricine snakes to test how prey type and size affect predatory behaviors and performance
Noah D Gripshover1, Bruce C Jayne2
1Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
|May 22, 2023
Summary
Snake predation behaviors like coiling and envenomation evolved to subdue formidable prey. These traits, particularly in crayfish-eating snakes (Liodytes rigida), enhance feeding success on challenging prey items.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Animal Behavior
- Herpetology
Background:
- Predation success is influenced by predator-prey interactions, including behavior, morphology, and size.
- Snakes that swallow prey whole face limitations in prey size (gape) and challenges in consuming live prey.
- Coiling and envenomation are behaviors that have evolved in snakes to restrain or kill prey.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the stereotyped predatory behaviors (coiling and envenomation) in the snake species *Liodytes rigida* when feeding on crayfish.
- To determine how prey type (hard-shell vs. soft-shell crayfish) and size influence the use of coiling and envenomation.
- To gain insights into the evolutionary trajectory of coiling and envenomation within the *Liodytes* genus by comparing with *Liodytes pygaea*.
Main Methods:
- Experimental manipulation of crayfish prey type and size for the snake *Liodytes rigida*.
- Observation and quantification of stereotyped predatory behaviors: envenomation, coiling, and swallowing latency.
- Comparative analysis with a closely related species, *Liodytes pygaea*, and previous studies on *L. alleni*.
Main Results:
- *Liodytes rigida* consistently used envenomation on hard-shell crayfish, with reduced but still significant use on soft-shell crayfish, especially with larger or recently molted prey.
- Coiling was more frequent with hard-shell crayfish and increased with the time since molting for soft-shell prey, but was independent of prey size.
- *Liodytes rigida* exhibited delayed swallowing until prey immobility, with longer delays for hard-shell crayfish; *L. pygaea* did not use coiling or envenomation.
Conclusions:
- Coiling likely evolved ancestrally within the *Liodytes* clade for specialized crayfish predators.
- Envenomation subsequently evolved in *L. rigida* as an additional adaptation for subduing formidable crayfish prey.
- These traits provide proximate benefits that support their evolution for enhanced feeding performance on challenging prey.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.5K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.5K
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
13.1K
Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the...
13.1K
Types of Selection
40.8K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.8K
Production Efficiency
16.9K
Net production efficiency (NPE) is the efficiency at which organisms assimilate energy into biomass for the next trophic level. Due to low metabolic rates and less energy spent on thermoregulatory processes, the NPE of ectotherms (cold-blooded animals) is 10 times higher than endotherms (warm-blooded animals).
16.9K
Frequency-dependent Selection
22.1K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
22.1K
Mate Choice
8.1K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.1K

