Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

560
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
560
Force Classification01:22

Force Classification

1.3K
Forces play a crucial role in the study of physics and engineering. They are essential in describing the motion, behavior, and equilibrium of objects in the physical world. Forces can be classified based on their origin, type, and direction of action.
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The polyunsaturated fatty acid and oxylipin plasma signature of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, case-control study.

Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence for automatic classification of needle EMG signals: A scoping review.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2024
Same author

Cardiac thrombus dissolution in acute ischemic stroke: A substudy of Mind the Heart.

Heliyon·2023
Same author

Correlation between EEG spectral power and cerebral perfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2023
Same author

Detection of patent foramen ovale in patients with ischemic stroke on prospective ECG-gated cardiac CT compared to transthoracic echocardiography.

Journal of neurology·2023
Same author

Infarct Evolution in Patients with Anterior Circulation Large-Vessel Occlusion Randomized to IV Alteplase and Endovascular Treatment versus Endovascular Treatment Alone.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

43.4K

High performance clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data classification using Convolutional Neural Network

M N van Stigt1,2, E A Groenendijk1,2, H A Marquering3,4

  • 1Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
|May 22, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Transfer learning effectively classifies electroencephalography (EEG) artifacts using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), even with limited dry electrode data. This approach significantly improves artifact detection accuracy in EEG signals.

Keywords:
ArtifactConvolutional neural networkDry electrodesElectroencephalographyTransfer learning

More Related Videos

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

5.7K
Reliable Acquisition of Electroencephalography Data during Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional MRI
11:00

Reliable Acquisition of Electroencephalography Data during Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional MRI

Published on: March 19, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding
11:25

Simultaneous Scalp Electroencephalography EEG, Electromyography EMG, and Whole-body Segmental Inertial Recording for Multi-modal Neural Decoding

Published on: July 26, 2013

43.4K
Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms
08:51

Statistical Modelling of Cortical Connectivity Using Non-invasive Electroencephalograms

Published on: November 1, 2019

5.7K
Reliable Acquisition of Electroencephalography Data during Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional MRI
11:00

Reliable Acquisition of Electroencephalography Data during Simultaneous Electroencephalography and Functional MRI

Published on: March 19, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Machine Learning
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) show promise for electroencephalography (EEG) artifact detection but require extensive datasets.
  • Dry electrode EEG datasets are notably sparse, posing a challenge for developing robust artifact detection algorithms.
  • Transfer learning offers a potential solution to overcome data scarcity in dry electrode EEG analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a CNN-based algorithm for classifying clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data.
  • To leverage transfer learning to address the limited availability of dry electrode EEG datasets.
  • To evaluate the performance of the developed algorithm in distinguishing artifactual from clean EEG signals.

Main Methods:

  • Dry electrode EEG data were collected from 13 subjects with induced artifacts.
  • A pre-trained CNN, initially trained on wet electrode EEG data, was fine-tuned using a sparse dry electrode dataset.
  • A majority voting ensemble of three fine-tuned CNNs was employed for the final classification algorithm.

Main Results:

  • The fine-tuned algorithm achieved a significantly improved test accuracy of 90.7%, compared to the pre-trained CNN's 65.6%.
  • The classification algorithm demonstrated high performance with an F1-score of 90.2%, precision of 89.1%, and recall of 91.2%.
  • The model was trained on 0.40 million and tested on 0.17 million overlapping EEG segments.

Conclusions:

  • Transfer learning successfully enabled the development of a high-performing CNN algorithm for clean versus artifact classification in dry electrode EEG data.
  • The study highlights the efficacy of transfer learning in overcoming data limitations for EEG artifact detection.
  • The developed algorithm offers a promising solution for accurate artifact classification in sparse dry electrode EEG datasets.