Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

12:10
Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
Published on: March 4, 2022
2.7K
Arc regulates a second-guessing cognitive bias during naturalistic foraging through effects on discrete behavior
Alicia Ravens1, Cornelia N Stacher-Hörndli1, Jared Emery2
1University of Utah, Department of Neurobiology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Iscience
|May 22, 2023
Summary
Mice exhibit a "second-guessing" cognitive bias in foraging, repeatedly checking empty patches. The gene Arc influences this bias, with deficient mice showing improved foraging efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Animal Behavior
- Genetics
Background:
- Animal foraging behavior often relies on innate decision-making heuristics.
- These heuristics can lead to cognitive biases, resulting in suboptimal choices.
- The genetic underpinnings of these cognitive biases are not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate innate cognitive biases in animal foraging.
- To explore the role of the synaptic plasticity gene Arc in these biases.
- To identify behavioral modules affected by Arc during foraging.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a naturalistic foraging paradigm with fasted mice.
- Observed and analyzed foraging decisions, including a bias termed "second-guessing."
- Employed unsupervised machine learning to decompose foraging behavior into modules.
Main Results:
- Discovered an innate cognitive bias called "second-guessing" where mice revisit empty food patches.
- Arc-deficient mice did not exhibit this bias and consumed more food, indicating improved foraging.
- Machine learning identified specific behavioral modules influenced by the Arc gene.
Conclusions:
- Highlights a genetic basis for cognitive biases in decision-making, specifically in foraging.
- Demonstrates a link between the Arc gene, specific behavioral modules, and cognitive bias.
- Provides insights into the ethological roles of Arc in naturalistic foraging behavior.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Naturalistic Observations
15.6K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.6K
Hindsight Biases
3.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.5K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K

