Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
[Instrument validation that measures disruptive education on clinical training]
Angel Omar Saenz-Acuña1, Haydeé Parra-Acosta1
1Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas Campus II, Departamento de Investigación. Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
Background:
During the contingency derived from the COVID-19 pandemic, there were no instruments assessing the aspects of clinical training, which is why it is necessary to have a questionnaire that let us know the opinion of medical students about the disruptive education.
Objective:
To validate a questionnaire designed to know the opinion of medical students about disruptive education in their clinical training.
Material And Methods:
Validation cross-sectional study which was developed in three phases: 1) Elaboration of the questionnaire aimed at undergraduate medical students who include clinical science subjects in their curricular program; 2) validation of content by Aiken's V test with 7 expert judges and reliability estimation with Cronbach's alpha coefficient in a pre-sample test with 48 students; 3) analysis of the information through descriptive statistics, where the following results were observed: Aiken's V index of V = 0.816; Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.966. A total of 54 items were incorporated in the questionnaire after the pre-sampling test.
Conclusions:
We can rely on a valid and reliable instrument that objectively measures disruptive education in the clinical training of medical students.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...

