Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selecting the Right Technique for the Treatment of Submental Adiposity.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2025
Same author

Should Mouth Taping and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Therapies Be Regulated?

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2024
Same author

Safety of An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol After Head and Neck Free Tissue Transfer.

The Laryngoscope·2024
Same author

Early and Late Complications of Mandibulectomy Free Flap Reconstruction: Does the Selective Use of Soft Tissue Only Flaps Reduce Complications?

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2024
Same author

Rapid <i>IDH1</i>-R132 genotyping panel utilizing locked nucleic acid loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

Biology methods & protocols·2024
Same author

Perforator-based chimeric ulnar forearm microvascular free tissue transfer reconstruction of post-radiated tracheoesophageal puncture fistulae.

Head & neck·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.8K

Virtual Surgical Planning in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Evan A Jones1, Andrew T Huang1

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Boulevard, Suite E5.200, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
|May 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Virtual surgical planning offers head and neck reconstructive surgeons significant benefits, including improved accuracy and efficiency. However, challenges like initial costs and reduced intraoperative flexibility must be considered.

Keywords:
Computer-assisted designHead and neck reconstructionMicrovascular free tissue transferVirtual surgical planning

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.1K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures
09:10

Digital Hybrid Model Preparation for Virtual Planning of Reconstructive Dentoalveolar Surgical Procedures

Published on: August 5, 2021

1.8K
Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions
06:18

Author Spotlight: Segmentation and VR for Advanced Neurovascular Interventions

Published on: April 5, 2024

1.1K
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Medical Technology
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Virtual surgical planning (VSP) is increasingly adopted in head and neck reconstruction.
  • This technology presents a paradigm shift from traditional surgical approaches.
  • Understanding its benefits and drawbacks is crucial for effective implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of virtual surgical planning in head and neck reconstructive surgery.
  • To provide a balanced perspective for surgeons considering VSP adoption.
  • To identify key areas for optimization in VSP workflows.

Main Methods:

  • This is a qualitative review of the current literature and clinical experience with VSP.
  • Analysis of reported outcomes, including operative time, accuracy, and patient rehabilitation.
  • Identification of common challenges and limitations encountered in VSP implementation.

Main Results:

  • VSP demonstrates strengths in reducing operative and ischemic times, enhancing accuracy, and facilitating complex reconstructions.
  • Streamlined dental rehabilitation and increased reconstruction durability are notable advantages.
  • Weaknesses include higher initial costs, potential surgical delays, and reduced intraoperative flexibility.

Conclusions:

  • Virtual surgical planning offers significant advantages for head and neck reconstruction, potentially improving outcomes and efficiency.
  • Surgeons must weigh these benefits against the drawbacks, such as cost and flexibility limitations.
  • Further research and technological advancements may mitigate current weaknesses and broaden VSP adoption.