Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

607
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
607
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.2K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

746
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
746
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

566
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
566
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

74.0K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
74.0K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

290
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
290

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Complete Genomes of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Viruses Isolated from Cases of Cervical Neoplasia and Squamous Cell Carcinomas Followed in Latvia in 2012-2024.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Tree-Structured Orthonormal Decomposition of the Aitchison Simplex.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of a rare concurrent sellar pituitary adenoma and suprasellar abscess: illustrative case.

Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons·2026
Same author

A comparative clinical study of stress distribution around implant supporting all - on - four versus all - on - 6 prosthetic concepts.

Bioinformation·2026
Same author

PLA2G16 deficiency enhances oxaliplatin sensitivity in colorectal cancer.

Tissue & cell·2026
Same author

LPCAT1 depletion inhibits colorectal cancer tumorigenesis and is associated with the ECM-receptor-interaction signaling pathway.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

CARL: A Framework for Equivariant Image Registration.

Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition·2026
Same journal

Unifying Top-down and Bottom-up Scanpath Prediction Using Transformers.

Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition·2026
Same journal

Latent Drifting in Diffusion Models for Counterfactual Medical Image Synthesis.

Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition·2026
Same journal

The Language of Motion: Unifying Verbal and Non-verbal Language of 3D Human Motion.

Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition·2026
Same journal

Perceptual Inductive Bias Is What You Need Before Contrastive Learning.

Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition·2026
Same journal

MultiMorph: On-demand Atlas Construction.

Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

645

Understanding Uncertainty Maps in Vision with Statistical Testing.

Jurijs Nazarovs1, Zhichun Huang2, Songwong Tasneeyapant1

  • 1University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
|May 24, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new framework for statistically comparing the uncertainty predictions of deep neural network (DNN) models in computer vision tasks. It enables hypothesis testing for image uncertainties, offering significant advancements for model evaluation.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
07:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

Published on: December 8, 2023

1.6K
Surface Mapping of Earth-like Exoplanets using Single Point Light Curves
06:48

Surface Mapping of Earth-like Exoplanets using Single Point Light Curves

Published on: May 10, 2020

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

645
Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping
07:11

Author Spotlight: Insights into Visual Cortex Research Through Wide-View fMRI Mapping

Published on: December 8, 2023

1.6K
Surface Mapping of Earth-like Exoplanets using Single Point Light Curves
06:48

Surface Mapping of Earth-like Exoplanets using Single Point Light Curves

Published on: May 10, 2020

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computer Vision
  • Machine Learning
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Quantitative uncertainty descriptions are crucial for deep neural network (DNN) models in machine learning and computer vision.
  • Existing methods for statistical testing of uncertainties from overparameterized models are limited, especially for high-resolution images.
  • Evaluating the uncertainty behavior of different models with similar accuracy profiles remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an efficient framework for hypothesis testing of uncertainty maps generated by DNNs.
  • To address the lack of statistical testing capabilities for model uncertainties in computer vision applications.
  • To enable statistically significant comparisons of uncertainty behaviors between different models.

Main Methods:

  • Revisiting Random Field Theory (RFT) principles.
  • Integrating RFT with deep neural network (DNN) tools to overcome computational challenges.
  • Developing hypothesis testing frameworks specifically for image-based uncertainties.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated an efficient framework for hypothesis testing of uncertainty maps from DNNs.
  • Showcased the ability to perform statistically significant comparisons of model uncertainty behaviors.
  • Validated the framework's viability across various computer vision experiments.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed RFT-enhanced DNN framework provides novel hypothesis testing capabilities for image uncertainties.
  • This approach facilitates statistically rigorous evaluation and comparison of uncertainty quantification in deep learning models.
  • The method is applicable to critical applications requiring reliable uncertainty assessment in computer vision.