Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Percutaneous versus surgical approach to aortic valve replacement with coronary revascularization: A systematic
Yujian Guo1, Wei Zhang2, Haibo Wu2
1Department of Graduate School, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, Shanxi, China.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) showed no increase in perioperative mortality compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, TAVR + PCI was linked to higher rates of coronary reintervention and reduced long-term survival.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis (AS) and complex coronary artery disease (CAD) present a challenging treatment scenario.
- The optimal management strategy for these patients is debated, necessitating comparative outcome analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) combined with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) against surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis was performed on six observational studies up to December 2022.
- Included were 135,003 patients (TAVR+PCI: n=6988; SAVR+CABG: n=128,015).
- Primary outcome was perioperative mortality; secondary outcomes included complications, bleeding, hospital stay, and long-term survival.
Main Results:
- TAVR + PCI did not significantly increase perioperative mortality, vascular complications, acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared to SAVR + CABG.
- TAVR + PCI significantly reduced major bleeding and length of hospital stay but increased pacemaker implantation.
- Long-term follow-up revealed TAVR + PCI was associated with higher coronary reintervention rates and reduced long-term survival.
Conclusions:
- For patients with AS and CAD, TAVR + PCI is a viable alternative to SAVR + CABG regarding perioperative mortality.
- The increased need for coronary reintervention and decreased long-term survival with TAVR + PCI warrants careful consideration in treatment decisions.
Objective:
The optimal treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and complex coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to investigate outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from its inception up to 17 December 2022 for studies that assessed TAVR + PCI versus SAVR + CABG in patients with AS and CAD. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality.
Results:
Six observational studies including 135,003 patients assessing TAVI + PCI (n = 6988) versus SAVR + CABG (n = 128,015) were included. Compared to SAVR + CABG, TAVR + PCI was not significantly associated with perioperative mortality (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.48-1.21; p = 0.25), vascular complications (RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.72-4.71; p = 0.20), acute kidney injury (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73-1.33; p = 0.95), myocardial infraction (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.30-1.77; p = 0.49), or stroke (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.74-1.02; p = 0.09). TAVR + PCI significantly reduced the incidence of major bleeding (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.24-0.36; p < 0.01) and length of hospital stay (MD, -1.60; 95% CI, -2.45 to -0.76; p < 0.01), but increased the incidence of pacemaker implantation (RR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.88-2.19; p < 0.01). At follow-up, TAVR + PCI was significantly associated with coronary reintervention (RR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.03-9.71; p = 0.04) and a reduced rate of long-term survival (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94; p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
In patients with AS and CAD, TAVR + PCI did not increase perioperative mortality, but increased the rates of coronary reintervention and long-term mortality.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management

