Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Automated 90Sr Separation and Preconcentration in a Lab-on-Valve System at Ppq Level
Published on: June 6, 2018
Experiences with accreditation for radon measurement laboratories
Hannah Wiedner1, Christian Rupp1
1Division of Radiation Protection, Municipal Department 39, Vienna, Austria.
New Austrian regulations require radon monitoring in workplaces. This guide details the accreditation process for radon measurement services, addressing challenges in calibration, uncertainty, and proficiency testing for compliance.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Radiation Protection
- Metrology
Background:
- Austrian national law, implementing Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM, mandates radon monitoring in designated priority regions.
- Employers in these regions must engage authorized radon monitoring services for workplace assessments in basements and ground floors.
- This legislation presents significant challenges for businesses, authorities, and measurement service providers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of the experiences and challenges encountered in becoming an accredited and authorized radon monitoring body.
- To serve as a practical guideline for laboratories pursuing accreditation for radon activity concentration measurements.
- To highlight specific technical and regulatory hurdles in radon measurement and accreditation.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing both integrating and time-resolved radon measurement equipment for monitoring.
- Describing the process of achieving accreditation and authorization as a radon monitoring service.
- Identifying and detailing key challenges in measurement uncertainty determination and metrological traceability.
Main Results:
- Successful accreditation and authorization as a radon monitoring body were achieved.
- Key challenges identified include metrologically traceable calibration of track-etch detectors and ensuring information beyond ISO 11665 standards.
- The availability and participation in proficiency tests were crucial but presented difficulties.
Conclusions:
- Accreditation as a radon monitoring body requires overcoming specific metrological and logistical challenges.
- Adherence to national legislation necessitates robust measurement protocols and uncertainty evaluations.
- This experience provides valuable insights for other laboratories seeking to enter the field of radon monitoring.
More Related Videos
06:20Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
09:36Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 4. Medical Imaging Procedures
Published on: October 3, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Radiation and Light Sources
Two common narrow-range 'line' sources used in AAS are hollow-cathode lamps (HCLs) and...
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab