Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Differences in BMI obesity measures in a workers compensation population: a cross-sectional study
Mark H Hyman1, Tamra J Peled2, Noah M Hyman3
1HymanHealth, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract:
To assess the accuracy of BMI compared to directly measured dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry percent body fat (DEXA %BF) among a worker compensation population.
Methods:
The agreement between BMI and DEXA %BF was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient among 1394 evaluable patients over a 5-year period. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to measure how well BMI can identify true obese and nonobese individuals.
Results:
Using at least 30kg/m2 to identify obesity, BNI had a specificity of 0.658 and a sensitivity of 0.735. The correlation was better in females at 0.66, compared to males at 0.55, and weaker in older age groups at 0.42, as compared to the youngest age group at 0.59. Overall, 29.8% of the population was reclassified based on their DEXA %BF measures.
Conclusions:
In a 5-year cohort worker compensation population, BMI was an inaccurate measure of true obesity.
More Related Videos
14:56Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
Published on: May 6, 2022
06:48Author Spotlight: Advancements in 3D Optical Imaging for Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment in Modern Research
Published on: June 7, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Obesity
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Cross-Sectional Research