How much of the outcome improvement after successful recanalization is explained by follow-up infarct volume

Helge Kniep1, Lukas Meyer2, Gabriel Broocks2

  • 1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany h.kniep@uke.de.

Abstract

Insights

Follow-up infarct volume reduction explains over half of the outcome improvement seen after successful mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for stroke. This confirms the value of imaging endpoints in clinical trials for stroke treatment efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) uses follow-up infarct volume (FIV) to assess treatment efficiency.
  • Previous studies show limited association between MT-related FIV reduction and patient outcomes.
  • The extent to which FIV reduction explains the link between recanalization success and functional outcome remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if FIV reduction mediates the relationship between successful recanalization and functional outcome in stroke patients.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of patients from the German Stroke Registry (May 2015-December 2019) with anterior circulation stroke.
  • Quantification of FIV reduction's effect on 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤2) after successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction ≥2b) using mediation analysis.

Main Results:

  • Successful recanalization was achieved in 72% of 429 analyzed patients.
  • FIV reduction explained 56% of the outcome improvement following successful recanalization.
  • Good functional outcome was associated with younger age, lower pre-stroke mRS, lower FIV, hypertension, and successful recanalization.

Conclusions:

  • FIV reduction accounts for a significant portion (56%) of outcome improvement after successful mechanical thrombectomy.
  • These findings support the use of FIV as a valuable imaging endpoint in clinical trials for stroke.
  • The remaining unexplained outcome improvement highlights a mismatch between radiological and clinical measures.

Related Concept Videos