Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

68
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
68
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

8.0K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
8.0K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

2.7K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
2.7K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

261
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
261
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.9K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing Random Effects in Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Two-Part Mixed-Effects Location Scale Models for Health Diary Data.

Nursing research·2025
Same author

Mixed-Methods Study of Disability Self-Management in Mexican Americans With Osteoarthritis.

Nursing research·2024
Same author

First-interview response patterns of intensive longitudinal psychological and health data.

Journal of health psychology·2024
Same author

A latent variable mixed-effects location scale model that also considers between-person differences in the autocorrelation.

Statistics in medicine·2023
Same author

Longitudinal Effects of Sex, Aging, and Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis on Function.

Nursing research·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Alternative covariance structures in mixed-effects models: Addressing intra- and inter-individual heterogeneity.

Shelley A Blozis1, Madeline Craft2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA. sablozis@ucdavis.edu.

Behavior Research Methods
|May 25, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study explores flexible mixed-effects models for analyzing longitudinal data, enhancing understanding of within- and between-subject variation. The research demonstrates how varied covariance structures improve the analysis of repeated measures and individual growth trajectories.

Keywords:
AutocorrelationMixed-effects location scale modelsNonlinear mixed-effects modelsProcedural learningResponse latencyWorking memory

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis

Background:

  • Mixed-effects models are crucial for analyzing repeated measures and longitudinal data, enabling subject-specific growth trajectories.
  • Standard models often assume homogeneity of within-subject residual variance and random coefficient variances.
  • Alternative covariance structures are needed to account for complex dependencies and heterogeneity in data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate flexible specifications of mixed-effects models for repeated measures and longitudinal data.
  • To explore various covariance structures for modeling within- and between-subject variation.
  • To enhance the understanding of individual differences in growth trajectories and their determinants.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized mixed-effects models with random coefficients for subject-specific growth.
  • Considered alternative covariance structures, including serial correlations and covariate-dependent variances.
  • Examined random coefficient variances as functions of covariates to study sources of variation.
  • Applied these flexible model specifications to data from three learning studies.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated that flexible mixed-effects models can effectively capture within- and between-subject variation.
  • Showcased the utility of alternative covariance structures in accounting for data dependencies and heterogeneity.
  • Highlighted the importance of modeling random coefficient variances as functions of covariates for a comprehensive analysis.
  • Successfully analyzed learning study data using diverse model specifications.

Conclusions:

  • Flexible mixed-effects models offer enhanced capabilities for analyzing repeated measures and longitudinal data.
  • The consideration of varied covariance structures is essential for accurately modeling complex within- and between-subject variation.
  • These advanced modeling techniques provide deeper insights into individual growth patterns and the factors influencing them.