Comparing Direct and Video Laryngoscopy Skills Between Resident and Attending Emergency Physicians

Introduction Advances in airway technology, in particular video laryngoscopy, are forcing attending emergency medicine physicians to master and maintain innovative airway skills. This study compares intubation times and other airway outcomes between resident and attending physicians using direct and video laryngoscopy in a mannequin model. Methods Fifty emergency medicine resident and attending physicians were asked to intubate a mannequin, using direct laryngoscopy, a C-MAC standard geometry blade, and a GlideScope hyperangulated blade. Intubation times, intubation success and accuracy, Cormack-Lehane grades, and the physician's opinion of the ease of the intubation were recorded for each intubation. Results Second-year residents had significantly quicker intubation times than attending physicians with all 3 intubation modalities. They also outperformed the interns when using the C-MAC standard geometry blade and had faster intubation times compared to third-year residents using direct laryngoscopy. When using the GlideScope hyperangulated blade, all 3 years of residents had lower intubation times compared to attending physicians and they were more accurate with endotracheal tube placement. Unlike the second-year residents, the third-year residents were not faster at direct laryngoscopy compared to the attending physicians. Conclusion Second-year residents outperformed their resident counterparts and the attending physicians with improved intubation times. Nontraditional intubation techniques associated with the GlideScope hyperangulated blade must be learned, practiced, and maintained by attending physicians, which is reflected in their longer intubation times compared to the residents. In addition, DL skills can deteriorate among resident physicians if they are not used on a regular basis.