Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
Published on: June 28, 2018
Unveiling controlling factors of the S0/S1 minimum-energy conical intersection (3): Frozen orbital analysis based on
Takeshi Yoshikawa1,2, Yasuhiro Ikabata3,4, Hiromi Nakai2,5
1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Funabashi, Chiba 274-8510, Japan.
Abstract:
Conical intersections (CIs), which indicate the crossing of two or more adiabatic electronic states, are crucial in the mechanisms of photophysical, photochemical, and photobiological processes. Although various geometries and energy levels have been reported using quantum chemical calculations, the systematic interpretation of the minimum energy CI (MECI) geometries is unclear. A previous study [Nakai et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 122, 8905 (2018)] performed frozen orbital analysis (FZOA) based on time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) at the MECI formed between the ground and first electronic excited states (S0/S1 MECI), thereby inductively clarifying two controlling factors. However, one of the factors that the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energy gap became close to the HOMO-LUMO Coulomb integral was not valid in the case of spin-flip TDDFT (SF-TDDFT), which is frequently used as a means of the geometry optimization of MECI [Inamori et al., J. Chem. Phys. 152, 144108 (2020)]. This study revisited the controlling factors using FZOA for the SF-TDDFT method. Based on spin-adopted configurations within a minimum active space, the S0-S1 excitation energy is approximately represented by the HOMO and LUMO energy gap ΔεHL, a contribution from Coulomb integrals JHL″ and that from the HOMO-LUMO exchange integral KHL″. Furthermore, numerical applications of the revised formula at the SF-TDDFT method confirmed the control factors of S0/S1 MECI.
Related Concept Videos
Molecular Orbital Theory I
Hückel's Rule Diagram of π MOs: Frost Circle
A Frost circle is constructed by drawing a polygon whose number of edges is equal to the number of carbons of the given cyclic system, with one of the vertices pointing down. Then, a circle is drawn enclosing the polygon so...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

