Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
Published on: March 4, 2022
Motivated Social Affordance Judgments of Humor Styles
1Department of Psychological Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Abstract:
Despite the ingratiating function of humor, not all humor is created equal. Individual differences in humor styles may inform perceptions of whether prospective group members afford affiliative opportunities, with affiliative humor being regarded as especially beneficial. In this research, we tasked participants with evaluating social targets espousing different humor styles to identify these targets' abilities satisfy and impede both affiliative and social goals (Study 1) while determining if individual differences in these motives foster heightened preferences (Study 2). Affiliative and self-enhancing humor afforded the most affiliative and self-protection opportunities, whereas aggressive humor afforded more threats. Additionally, higher need to belong heightened preferences for affiliative humor. Results provide evidence for assortative sociality in the identification of optimum group members based on humor displays.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Attribution Theory
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Social Facilitation

