Related Experiment Videos
Asymptomatic microhematuria and urologic disease. A population-based study.
JAMA
|July 11, 1986
Summary
Asymptomatic microhematuria, a common finding, rarely indicates serious urologic disease or cancer. Further investigation is often unnecessary unless other risk factors are present.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Nephrology
- Oncology
Background:
- Asymptomatic microhematuria is frequently observed in adult men and postmenopausal women.
- Previous guidelines recommended extensive urologic evaluations for all patients with this condition.
- These recommendations were based on studies of referred, rather than general, populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the actual frequency of serious urologic diseases in a general population experiencing asymptomatic microhematuria.
- To evaluate the necessity of comprehensive urologic investigations for asymptomatic microhematuria.
Main Methods:
- A population-based study was conducted in Rochester, Minn.
- The study analyzed the prevalence of serious urologic conditions in individuals with asymptomatic microhematuria.
Main Results:
- Serious urologic disease was found in only 2.3% of patients with asymptomatic microhematuria.
- Bladder or renal cell carcinoma was identified in a mere 0.5% of cases.
- Urologic malignancies were more common in elderly individuals, and a trend suggested more severe disease with higher hematuria grades.
Conclusions:
- Routine, complete urologic investigation for all patients with asymptomatic microhematuria is not recommended.
- Further evaluation should be guided by the presence of additional risk factors.
- Selective investigation based on risk stratification is a more appropriate approach.