Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
Published on: February 10, 2023
Cannabinoid and Opioid Receptor Affinity and Modulation of Cancer-Related Signaling Pathways of Machaeriols and
Ilias Muhammad1, Mohammad A Ibrahim1, Mallika Kumarihamy1
1National Center for Natural Products Research, Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA.
Abstract:
Machaeriols and machaeridiols are unique hexahydrodibenzopyran-type aralkyl phytocannabinoids isolated from Machaerium Pers. Earlier studies of machaeriol A (1) and B (2) did not show any affinity for cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1 or CNR1), although they are structural analogs of psychoactive hexahydrocannabinol. This study comprehensively reports on the affinities of isolated Machaerium Pers. compounds, namely machaeriol A-D (1-4) and machaeridiol A-C (5-7), against cannabinoid (CB1 and CB2) and opioid (κ, δ and µ) receptors. Among the isolated compounds, machaeriol D (4) and machaeridiol A-C (5-7) showed some selective binding affinity for the CB2 receptor, using a radioligand binding assay, with Ki values of >1.3, >1.77, >2.18 and >1.1 μM, respectively. On the other hand, none of the compounds showed any binding to the CB1 receptor. Due to recent reports on the anticancer potential of the endocannabinoid system, compounds 1-7 were tested against a battery of luciferase reporter gene vectors that assess the activity of many cancer-related signaling pathways, including Stat3, Smad2/3, AP-1, NF-κB, E2F, Myc, Ets, Notch, FoxO, Wnt, Hedgehog and pTK in HeLa and T98G glioblastoma cells. Complete dose-response curves have been determined for each compound in both of these cell lines, which revealed that machaeridiol 6 displayed activities (IC50 in µM in HeLa and T98G cells) towards Stat3 (4.7, 1.4), Smad2/3 (1.2, 3.0), AP-1 (5.9, 4.2), NF-κB (0.5, 4.0), E2F (5.7, 0.7), Myc (5.3, 2.0), ETS (inactive, 5.9), Notch (5.3, 4.6), Wnt (4.2, inactive) and Hedgehog (inactive, 5.0). Furthermore, a combination study between machaeriol C (3) and machaeridiol B (6) displayed additive effects for E2F, ETS, Wnt and Hedgehog pathways, where these compounds individually were either minimally active or inactive. None of the compounds inhibited luciferase expression driven by the minimal thymidine kinase promoter (pTK), indicating the lack of general cytotoxicity for luciferase enzyme inhibition at the 50 µM concentration in both of these cell lines. The significance of the inhibition of these signaling pathways via machaeridiol 5-7 and their cross-talk potential has been discussed.
More Related Videos
07:23Assessment of Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia and Analgesic Tolerance in Mice Using Thermal and Mechanical Nociceptive Modalities
Published on: July 29, 2014
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Opioid Receptors: Overview
Analgesia and Pain Management
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Opioid Analgesics: Morphine and Other Natural Cogeners
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Cholinergic Receptors: Muscarinic
The subtypes M1, M3, and M5 couple with the Gq subunit and activate the phospholipase C (PLC) activity, mobilizing intracellular Ca2+....