Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Accelerating Diagnostic Accuracy with Direct Identification of Gram-Negatives from Blood Culture Bottles
Published on: May 24, 2024
Comparison of different measuring methods in the assessment of the ISNT rule and its variants in a normal population:
Ivo Soares1,2,3, Marta Gravito-Soares4,5, Elisa Gravito-Soares4,5
1Department of Physics, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to compare five different neuroretinal rim (NRR) measurement methods, based on quadrants and NRR widths, in the assessment of the ISNT (inferior (I) > superior (S) > nasal (N) > temporal (T)) rule, and its variants IST (inferior (I) > superior (S) > temporal (S)) rule, IS (inferior (I) > superior (S)) rule and T (temporal is the thinnest) rule in a normal population. Factors influencing compliance with this rule and its variants were also evaluated.
Methods:
Stereoscopic fundus images were analysed through a dichoptic viewing system. Two graders labelled the optic disc and cup, as well as the fovea. Custom-made software automatically determined the limits of the optic disc and cup and examined the ISNT rule and its variants using several NRR measurement methods.
Results:
Sixty-nine subjects with normal eyes were enrolled. For the various NRR measuring methods, the percentage of eyes following the rules, that is, validity ranges were 0.0%-15.9% for the ISNT rule, 31.9%-59.4% for the IST rule, 46.4%-59.4% for the IS rule and 50.7%-100.0% for the T rule. Significant intra-measurement agreement ranges were IST (κ = 0.50-0.85), IS (κ = 0.68-1.00) and T (κ = 0.24-0.77). Only the IST and IS rules achieved significant inter-measurement agreement (κ = 0.47-1.00). After multivariate and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, the vertical cup position cupy (area under the ROC curve (AUROC) = 0.60-0.96; cut-off = |0.005|) was the most important predictor for virtually all NRR measurement agreements for the ISNT, IST and IS rules. The horizontal cup position (AUROC = 0.50-0.92; cut-off = -0.028 to 0.05) was the most important predictive factor for the majority of the NRR measurement agreements for the T rule.
Conclusions:
Only the IST and IS rules are valid for the same normal subjects. The most important factor affecting the validity of the ISNT rule and its variants was the anatomical cup position. NRR measurement agreements based on NRR quadrants exhibited larger validity and better agreement. The IST and IS rules can be combined with the alternative SIT (superior (S) > inferior (I) > temporal (T)) and SI (superior (S) > inferior (I)) rules to detect almost all normal subjects.
More Related Videos
11:19Merging Absolute and Relative Quantitative PCR Data to Quantify STAT3 Splice Variant Transcripts
Published on: October 9, 2016
10:57Visualizing Genetic Variants, Short Targets, and Point Mutations in the Morphological Tissue Context with an RNA In Situ Hybridization Assay
Published on: August 14, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Central Limit Theorem
The sample size, n, that...
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics
One of...
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
Regression Toward the Mean
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...