Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025
Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
Comprehensive Evaluation of a Deep Learning Model for Automatic Organs-at-Risk Segmentation on Heterogeneous Computed
Wenjun Liao1, Xiangde Luo2, Yuan He3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Purpose:
Our purpose was to develop a deep learning model (AbsegNet) that produces accurate contours of 16 organs at risk (OARs) for abdominal malignancies as an essential part of fully automated radiation treatment planning.
Methods And Materials:
Three data sets with 544 computed tomography scans were retrospectively collected. Data set 1 was split into 300 training cases and 128 test cases (cohort 1) for AbsegNet. Data set 2, including cohort 2 (n = 24) and cohort 3 (n = 20), were used to validate AbsegNet externally. Data set 3, including cohort 4 (n = 40) and cohort 5 (n = 32), were used to clinically assess the accuracy of AbsegNet-generated contours. Each cohort was from a different center. The Dice similarity coefficient and 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance were calculated to evaluate the delineation quality for each OAR. Clinical accuracy evaluation was classified into 4 levels: no revision, minor revisions (0% < volumetric revision degrees [VRD] ≤ 10%), moderate revisions (10% ≤ VRD < 20%), and major revisions (VRD ≥20%).
Results:
For all OARs, AbsegNet achieved a mean Dice similarity coefficient of 86.73%, 85.65%, and 88.04% in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and a mean 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance of 8.92, 10.18, and 12.40 mm, respectively. The performance of AbsegNet outperformed SwinUNETR, DeepLabV3+, Attention-UNet, UNet, and 3D-UNet. When experts evaluated contours from cohorts 4 and 5, 4 OARs (liver, kidney_L, kidney_R, and spleen) of all patients were scored as having no revision, and over 87.5% of patients with contours of the stomach, esophagus, adrenals, or rectum were considered as having no or minor revisions. Only 15.0% of patients with colon and small bowel contours required major revisions.
Conclusions:
We propose a novel deep-learning model to delineate OARs on diverse data sets. Most contours produced by AbsegNet are accurate and robust and are, therefore, clinically applicable and helpful to facilitate radiation therapy workflow.
