Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2025
FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
When to Consult a Geneticist Specialising in Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
Lesley McMahon1, Geoffrey J Maher2, Caroline Joyce3,4
1Hydatidiform Mole Follow-Up Service (HMFUS) Scotland, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
Background:
Gestational trophoblastic disease comprises hydatidiform moles and a rare group of malignancies that derive from trophoblasts. Although there are typical morphological features that may distinguish hydatidiform moles from non-molar products of conception, such features are not always present, especially at early stages of pregnancy. Furthermore, mosaic/chimeric pregnancies and twin pregnancies make pathological diagnosis challenging while trophoblastic tumours can also pose diagnostic problems in terms of their gestational or non-gestational origin.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to show that ancillary genetic testing can be used to aid diagnosis and clinical management of GTD.
Methods:
Each author identified cases where genetic testing, including short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping, ploidy analysis, next-generation sequencing, and immunostaining for p57, the product of the imprinted gene CDKN1C, facilitated accurate diagnosis and improved patient management. Representative cases were chosen to illustrate the value of ancillary genetic testing in different scenarios.
Outcome:
Genetic analysis of placental tissue can aid in determining the risk of developing gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, facilitating discrimination between low risk triploid (partial) and high risk androgenetic (complete) moles, discriminating between a hydatidiform mole twinned with a normal conceptus and a triploid conception and identification of androgenetic/biparental diploid mosaicism/chimerism. STR genotyping of placental tissue and targeted gene sequencing of patients can identify women with an inherited predisposition to recurrent molar pregnancies. Genotyping can distinguish gestational from non-gestational trophoblastic tumours using tissue or circulating tumour DNA and can also identify the causative pregnancy which is the key prognostic factor for placental site and epithelioid trophoblastic tumours.
Conclusions And Outlook:
STR genotyping and p57 immunostaining have been invaluable to the management of gestational trophoblastic disease in many situations. The use of next-generation sequencing and of liquid biopsies is opening up new pathways for GTD diagnostics. Development of these techniques has the potential to identify novel biomarkers of GTD and further refine diagnosis.
