Frontline Management of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia with Chemoimmunotherapy

Despite the introduction of effective novel agents, chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), with its widespread use, retains relevance and is one of the 2 vastly disparate strategies to treat Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), the alternative being the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-based approach. Considerable evidence over the past decades supports the integration of the monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, to the CIT backbone in WM, a CD20+ malignancy. Besides substantial efficacy, the finite duration of the treatment, coupled with lower rates of cumulative and long-term, clinically significant adverse effects and greater affordability, make CIT appealing, notwithstanding the lack of quality-of-life data with such an approach in WM. A phase 3 randomized controlled trial reported substantially higher efficacy and a more favorable safety profile of the bendamustine-rituximab (BR) doublet compared with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) among patients with WM. Subsequent studies reaffirmed its high efficacy and tolerability, making BR the mainstay of managing treatment-naïve patients with WM. High-quality evidence supporting the use of BR over Dexamethasone, Rituximab, and Cyclophosphamide (DRC), another commonly used regimen, is lacking, as is its comparison with the continuous BTKi-based approach. However, DRC appeared less potent than BR in cross-trial comparisons and retrospective series involving treatment-naïve patients with WM. Additionally, a recent retrospective, international study demonstrated comparable outcomes with fixed-duration BR and continuous ibrutinib monotherapy among previously untreated, age-matched patients exhibiting MYD88^L265P mutation. However, unlike ibrutinib, BR appears effective irrespective of the MYD88 mutation status. CIT, preferably BR, is well suited to serve as the control arm (comparator) regimen against which novel targeted agents may be evaluated as frontline therapies for WM in high-quality trials. Purine analog-based CIT has been extensively evaluated in WM, although its use has waned, even in the multiply relapsed patient population, as effective and safer alternatives emerge.