Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Factors that influence outcomes and device use for pediatric cochlear implant recipients with unilateral hearing loss
Lisa R Park1, Erika B Gagnon1, Margaret T Dillon1
1Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Insights
Cochlear implant (CI) use in children with single-sided deafness (SSD) improves speech recognition, especially with higher hearing hour percentage (HHP). Factors like time since activation and hearing loss onset influence outcomes, not age or duration of deafness.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Medicine
Background:
- Cochlear implantation (CI) candidacy in the US now includes children with single-sided deafness (SSD) aged 5+.
- Pediatric CI users with SSD show improved speech recognition with increased daily device use.
- Limited data exists on hearing hour percentage (HHP) and non-use in pediatric CI recipients with SSD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate factors influencing outcomes in children with SSD using CIs.
- To identify factors affecting daily device use in pediatric CI users with SSD.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 97 pediatric CI recipients with SSD (2014-2022) with datalogger records.
- Speech recognition assessed using CNC words (CI-alone) and BKB-SIN (CI + normal-hearing ear) with varying spatial conditions.
- Linear mixed-effects models analyzed the impact of time since activation, duration of deafness, HHP, and age on performance (CNC, spatial release from masking [SRM]).
Main Results:
- Higher HHP, longer time since activation, and shorter duration of deafness correlated with better CNC word scores.
- Increased HHP was significantly associated with greater spatial release from masking (SRM).
- Children with sudden hearing loss exhibited higher HHP compared to those with progressive or congenital losses.
Conclusions:
- No specific age or duration of deafness cut-off is supported for pediatric CI in SSD.
- Higher HHP is linked to better speech recognition and spatial hearing outcomes.
- Younger children and early post-activation periods show higher HHP; clinicians should discuss these factors with families.
Introduction:
Candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation in the United States has expanded to include children with single-sided deafness (SSD) who are at least 5 years of age. Pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users with SSD experience improved speech recognition with increased daily device use. There are few studies that report the hearing hour percentage (HHP) or the incidence of non-use for pediatric CI recipients with SSD. The aim of this study was to investigate factors that impact outcomes in children with SSD who use CIs. A secondary aim was to identify factors that impact daily device use in this population.
Methods:
A clinical database query revealed 97 pediatric CI recipients with SSD who underwent implantation between 2014 and 2022 and had records of datalogs. The clinical test battery included speech recognition assessment for CNC words with the CI-alone and BKB-SIN with the CI plus the normal-hearing ear (combined condition). The target and masker for the BKB-SIN were presented in collocated and spatially separated conditions to evaluate spatial release from masking (SRM). Linear mixed-effects models evaluated the influence of time since activation, duration of deafness, HHP, and age at activation on performance (CNC and SRM). A separate linear mixed-effects model evaluated the main effects of age at testing, time since activation, duration of deafness, and onset of deafness (stable, progressive, or sudden) on HHP.
Results:
Longer time since activation, shorter duration of deafness, and higher HHP were significantly correlated with better CNC word scores. Younger age at device activation was not found to be a significant predictor of CNC outcomes. There was a significant relationship between HHP and SRM, with children who had higher HHP experiencing greater SRM. There was a significant negative correlation between time since activation and age at test with HHP. Children with sudden hearing loss had a higher HHP than children with progressive and congenital hearing losses.
Conclusion:
The present data presented here do not support a cut-off age or duration of deafness for pediatric cochlear implantation in cases of SSD. Instead, they expand on our understanding of the benefits of CI use in this population by reviewing the factors that influence outcomes in this growing patient population. Higher HHP, or greater percentage of time spent each day using bilateral input, was associated with better outcomes in the CI-alone and in the combined condition. Younger children and those within the first months of use had higher HHP. Clinicians should discuss these factors and how they may influence CI outcomes with potential candidates with SSD and their families. Ongoing work is investigating the long-term outcomes in this patient population, including whether increasing HHP after a period of limited CI use results in improved outcomes.

