Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions
Published on: March 31, 2023
Endorsement of scientific inquiry promotes better evaluation of climate policy evidence
Jessica E Hughes1, James D Sauer1, Aaron Drummond2
1Present Address: School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.
Abstract:
Public and scientific consensus about climate change do not align. Problematically, higher scientific knowledge has been associated with lower acceptance of climate information among those with more conservative socio-political ideologies. Positive attitudes towards science can attenuate this effect. We investigated the association between endorsement of scientific inquiry (ESI) and decision-making with scientific evidence about climate policies. Participants rated support for 16 climate policies accompanied by weaker or stronger evidence. In study 1 (N = 503), higher ESI was associated with greater discernment between strongly and weakly evidenced climate policies, irrespective of worldview. In studies 2 (N = 402) and 3 (N = 600), an ESI intervention improved discrimination, and, in study 3, increased ESI specifically for hierarchical/individualistic participants. Unlike ESI, the link between scientific knowledge and evaluation of evidence was influenced by worldview. Increasing ESI might improve the evaluation of scientific evidence and increase public support for evidence-based climate policies.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10584-023-03535-y.
Related Concept Videos
Global Climate Change
What is Climate?
The Scientific Method
The Evidence for Evolution
Confirmation Biases
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...

