Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

517
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
517
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.4K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.4K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.4K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.4K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

233
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
233
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

285
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
285
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

3.5K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
3.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinct Metabolomic and Lipidomic Profiles Across Donation after Circulatory Death Recovery Strategies Reveal a Common Signature Associated with Primary Graft Dysfunction.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2026
Same author

Dynamical modeling of individual sensory reactivity and habituation learning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

FDA Draft Guidance for the Use of Bayesian Methods in Clinical Trials.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Pathfinder: Parallel quasi-Newton variational inference.

Journal of machine learning research : JMLR·2026
Same author

Multilevel regression and poststratification interface: an application to track community-level COVID-19 viral transmission.

Population health metrics·2026
Same author

A multilevel Bayesian approach to climate-fueled migration and conflict.

Scientific reports·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

463

Bayesian Analysis of Tests with Unknown Specificity and Sensitivity.

Andrew Gelman1, Bob Carpenter2

  • 1Columbia University, New York, USA.

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied Statistics
|May 30, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Estimating rare disease prevalence is challenging with imperfect tests and non-representative samples. Bayesian hierarchical models and post-stratification can improve accuracy by accounting for test uncertainty and sample bias.

Keywords:
Bayesian inferenceDiagnostic testingSensitivitySensitivity analysisSpecificity

More Related Videos

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K
Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
04:57

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

522

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
06:16

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease

Published on: August 9, 2024

463
Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.1K
Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples
04:57

Comparative Analysis of Automatic Fecal Analyzer versus Direct Wet Smear Microscopy for Detecting Parasitic Infections in Stool Samples

Published on: April 25, 2025

522

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Prevalence estimates for rare diseases are sensitive to test accuracy (sensitivity, specificity).
  • Non-representative samples, common in opt-in studies, introduce selection bias.
  • Uncertainty in test parameters and sample representativeness complicates accurate prevalence estimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present Bayesian hierarchical models and multilevel regression and post-stratification for accurate disease prevalence estimation.
  • To address uncertainties in test performance and sample representativeness in prevalence studies.
  • To demonstrate the application of these methods using a SARS-CoV-2 antibody study.

Main Methods:

  • Bayesian inference and hierarchical modeling to propagate uncertainties in test sensitivity and specificity.
  • Multilevel regression and post-stratification to adjust for known differences between sample and population.
  • Implementation of models using Stan for practical application.

Main Results:

  • Hierarchical regression and post-stratification models were demonstrated with code.
  • Application to a SARS-CoV-2 antibody study highlighted limitations of previous analyses.
  • Wide posterior intervals indicated inability to validate quantitative claims regarding unreported infections.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian methods and post-stratification can improve disease prevalence estimates from imperfect tests and non-representative samples.
  • These methods help account for uncertainty in test parameters and sample selection bias.
  • Future studies can benefit from these techniques for more accurate prevalence assessments.