Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

Standards of Care I

Standards of Care I

Federal statutes profoundly impact nursing practice, providing critical guidelines to ensure patient care is equitable, accessible, and of the highest quality. The following laws address distinct aspects of healthcare provision and patient rights:

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Development of a core outcome set for physiotherapy trials in adults with bronchiectasis (the COS-PHyBE study): A Delphi study and consensus meeting.

Heliyon·2024

Same author

Perceptions of undertaking a higher degree alongside dental specialty training: A cross-sectional survey of UK dental specialty trainees.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2024

Same author

Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2024

Same author

Diversity of authors in the <i>British Journal of Orthodontics</i> and <i>Journal of Orthodontics</i> over the last 50 years.

Journal of orthodontics·2024

Same author

50<sup>th</sup> Birthday Reflections.

Journal of orthodontics·2024

Same author

Outcomes of physiotherapy for people living with bronchiectasis: qualitative study to inform development of a core outcome set.

Physiotherapy·2023

Same journal

Biological significance and regulatory networks of mRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs in human periodontal ligament tissues induced by orthodontic tooth movement.

European journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

The use of teleorthodontics and artificial intelligence for orthodontic triage and screening in a publicly funded healthcare system: A crossover randomized controlled trial.

European journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

Very long-term (≥ 15 years) prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in adult Herbst patients.

European journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

Failure rates of 958 interradicular mini-screws for maxillary total arch distalization following a well-established insertion protocol.

European journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

Compensatory characteristics and influencing factors of the sagittal curvature of the maxillary arch based on three-dimensional fusion imaging.

European journal of orthodontics·2026

Same journal

Correction to: Glass ionomer open exposure and closed exposure of palatally displaced canines: a randomised controlled trial comparing postoperative pain perception and complications.

European journal of orthodontics·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

How well do orthodontic RCTs comply with CONSORT guidelines?

Dima Mobarak¹, Jayne E Harrison¹, Sally Spencer²

¹Department of Orthodontics, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Liverpool, UK.

European Journal of Orthodontics

|May 30, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in orthodontic journals significantly improved between 2016-2020, particularly in the Angle Orthodontist and European Journal of Orthodontics. Adherence to Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines is key for enhanced scientific transparency.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

Studying Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mice

Studying Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mice

Published on: August 2, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

Studying Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mice

Studying Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Mice

Published on: August 2, 2024

Area of Science:

Orthodontics
Clinical Trial Methodology
Scientific Publishing

Background:

The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines are crucial for enhancing the transparency and reproducibility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Assessing adherence to CONSORT guidelines in specialized fields like orthodontics is essential for evaluating the quality of published research.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate changes in CONSORT guideline compliance for orthodontic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) across four leading journals.
To determine if the reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding has improved over time.

Main Methods:

A systematic search identified orthodontic RCTs published in the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Angle Orthodontist, European Journal of Orthodontics, and Journal of Orthodontics.
Studies were analyzed for CONSORT checklist item reporting in two periods: January 2016-June 2017 (T1) and January 2019-June 2020 (T2).

Main Results:

The overall median CONSORT score increased significantly from 48.7% in T1 to 67% in T2 (P = 0.001).
Improved reporting was noted in the Angle Orthodontist (P = 0.016) and European Journal of Orthodontics (P = 0.023), but not significantly in the other two journals.
Reporting of random allocation sequence generation (OR 2.09) and allocation concealment (OR 2.27) significantly increased in T2 compared to T1, while blinding reporting did not show significant change.

Conclusions:

Reporting quality of orthodontic RCTs, based on CONSORT guidelines, significantly improved from 2016-2017 to 2019-2020.
Further enhancements in reporting can be achieved through diligent adherence to CONSORT guidelines by authors, peer reviewers, and editors.