Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.0K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.9K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.9K
Behrens–Fisher Test00:57

Behrens–Fisher Test

115
The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test...
115
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.1K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.1K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A preliminary data analysis workflow for meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same author

The impact of distributed practice schedules within a classwide computation intervention: A randomized control trial.

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same author

Correction: A meta-analysis of the effects of mindfulness meditation training on self-reported interoception.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

A meta-analysis of the effects of mindfulness meditation training on self-reported interoception.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia With TCF3::PBX1 Fusion Presenting a Mature B-Cell Phenotype and Lambda Light-Chain Restriction.

Pediatric blood & cancer·2025
Same author

A network analysis of gene co-expression in post-mortem brain tissues identifying novel genes and biological pathways underlying major depression.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2025
Same journal

The overlooked role of internalizing symptoms in adolescent executive function: Insights from self- and teacher ratings.

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

How do schools support students after a behavioral threat assessment?

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

The roles of parent and teacher support in students' academic development: Do associations change over the course of adolescence or is support always important for all students?

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

Pragmatic measures for school-based research and practice: Best practices and future directions.

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

Pragmatic measurement of mechanisms: Does use of coping strategies mediate the effects of a teacher stress intervention?

Journal of school psychology·2026
Same journal

Beyond the individual: Latent growth patterns of schoolwide bullying perpetration, traditional victimization, and cyber victimization in relation to social and emotional learning.

Journal of school psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Between-case standardized mean differences: Flexible methods for single-case designs.

Man Chen1, James E Pustejovsky1, David A Klingbeil1

  • 1University of Wisconsin - Madison, USA.

Journal of School Psychology
|May 30, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new quantitative methods for analyzing complex single-case designs (SCDs). These advanced between-case standardized mean difference (BC-SMD) techniques enhance the synthesis of intervention effects across diverse research designs.

Keywords:
Between-case standardized mean differenceEffect sizeMultiple baseline designSingle-case design

More Related Videos

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.6K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.6K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Science
  • Educational Psychology
  • Quantitative Research Methods

Background:

  • Single-case designs (SCDs) are crucial for evaluating interventions in educational and clinical settings.
  • Visual analysis is common, but quantitative methods are needed for synthesizing results and generalization.
  • Existing between-case standardized mean difference (BC-SMD) methods are limited to specific SCDs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend existing BC-SMD methods to more complex multiple baseline designs.
  • To provide quantitative synthesis tools for a wider range of single-case research.
  • To facilitate systematic generalizations across diverse SCDs.

Main Methods:

  • Developed BC-SMD estimation methods for replicated multiple baseline (across behaviors/settings), clustered multiple baseline, and multivariate multiple baseline designs.
  • Illustrated the proposed methods by re-analyzing data from a published SCD study.
  • Focused on extending quantitative synthesis capabilities for complex SCDs.

Main Results:

  • Successfully extended BC-SMD estimation to several complex multiple baseline design variations.
  • Demonstrated the practical application of these new methods through data re-analysis.
  • Provided a framework for more robust quantitative synthesis across diverse SCDs.

Conclusions:

  • The developed BC-SMD methods offer enhanced quantitative synthesis for complex single-case designs.
  • These methods facilitate more systematic generalizations and integration of findings across various research approaches.
  • Expanded quantitative tools are vital for advancing evidence-based practices informed by single-case research.