Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Five-Year Prognostic Value of DAPT Score in Older Patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A
Kailun Yan1, Pei Zhu1, Xiaofang Tang1
1National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College.
Insights
The DAPT score did not predict major adverse cardiovascular events in older patients after PCI. However, it showed some predictive value for major bleeding events over a 5-year period.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Geriatric Medicine
Background:
- The dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score is utilized to assess risks in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Its prognostic value in older populations (≥ 65 years) requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term predictive capability of the DAPT score for ischemic events and bleeding in elderly patients post-PCI.
- To determine if the DAPT score is a reliable prognostic tool for this specific demographic.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 10,724 patients who underwent PCI was analyzed, with a focus on 2,981 patients aged 65 years or older.
- Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding were tracked over a 5-year follow-up period.
- Multivariate Cox regression and ROC curve analysis were employed to assess the DAPT score's prognostic value.
Main Results:
- The DAPT score did not significantly predict MACCE (AUROC: 0.534, P=0.079) in older PCI patients.
- A higher DAPT score (≥ 2) was associated with a significantly increased risk of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (HR: 2.447, P=0.002).
- The DAPT score demonstrated a certain prognostic value for predicting bleeding events (AUROC: 0.646, P<0.001).
Conclusions:
- The DAPT score is not a reliable predictor of ischemic events (MACCE) in elderly patients following PCI.
- The DAPT score shows a degree of predictive utility for identifying older PCI patients at higher risk of significant bleeding over a 5-year period.
Aim:
The dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) score is recommended for predicting the risk of ischemia and bleeding for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognostic value of the DAPT score in older PCI patients.
Methods:
This study enrolled 10,724 consecutive patients who underwent PCI from January 2013 to December 2013 in Fu Wai hospital, among whom 2,981 (27.8%) were aged ≥ 65 years. The ischemic endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, including myocardial infarction, all-cause death, and stroke). The bleeding endpoint was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5 bleeding.
Results:
After a 5-year follow-up, 256 (12.0%) MACCEs and 53 (2.5%) BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding occurred. The patients were divided into two groups according to the DAPT score: the low-score (<2, n=1,646) and high-score (≥ 2, n=485) group. Multivariate Cox regression revealed that the risk of MACCE was similar between the two groups [hazard ratio (HR): 1.214, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.916-1.609, P=0.178], whereas the risk of bleeding was significantly higher in the high-score group than in the low-score group (HR: 2.447, 95% CI: 1.407-4.257, P=0.002). The DAPT score did not show prognostic value in MACCE [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), 0.534; 95% CI: 0.496-0.572, P=0.079]; however, it demonstrated a certain prognostic value in BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding (AUROC, 0.646; 95% CI: 0.573-0.719, P<0.001).
Conclusion:
This study suggested that in older PCI patients, the DAPT score did not show predictive value for MACCE; however, it had a certain predictive value for 5-year BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation