Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2025

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Reducing Nonsentinel Harm Events due to Medication Errors by Using Mini-Root Cause Analysis and Action
Ghada Hussain Al Mardawi1, Rajkumar Rajendram2,3, Souzan Mohammed Alowesie1
1Department of Quality Improvement, King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Abdulaziz International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard - Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Introduction:
A full root cause analysis (RCA) such as that required following a sentinel event is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and expensive. This quality improvement project used a similar but abbreviated process (mini-RCA and action; mini-RCA2) in response to medication errors that caused less serious harm.
Methods:
In 2018, all medication errors that caused harm due to system failures but were not sentinel events were investigated by mini-RCA2. The incidence of similar medication errors reported in the year before and in the year after the introduction of mini-RCA2 was compared to determine the impact of this intervention. Similar events were identified by searching the safety reporting system database for reported medication errors by drug name (e.g., Humate® P) and/or event type (e.g., prescribing error-omission of a patient's home medications on admission to hospital). The time and labor costs of this intervention were estimated.
Results:
Seven medication errors were investigated by mini-RCA2. More than 48 members of staff from 11 clinical and nonclinical departments contributed to the identification of 39 system failures and made 42 recommendations, of which 22 (52%) were implemented. This reduced the recurrence of reports of similar events from 35 (0.57%) to 21 (0.36%). Although this 0.21% absolute decrease did not achieve statistical significance, recurrence of similar harm events was reduced from 7 (0.11%) to 0 (p = 0.016). Benefits were greatest when the mini-RCA2 recommendations were fully implemented. This reduced the recurrence of similar events from 9 (0.21%) to 0 (p = 0.007). A total of 251 hours (mean ± SD, 35.9 ± 16.6 hours) were required for this intervention. The associated labor cost was Saudi Arabia Riyal (SAR) 34,181 (US $8256; mean SAR ± SD, 4883 ± 1302 [mean US $ ± SD, $2102 ± $561]).
Conclusion:
The use of mini-RCA2 to review medication errors provided a structured process to manage reported events, monitor the implementation of recommendations, and assess the effectiveness of implemented actions. The use of this rapid process to investigate errors that cause harm but are not sentinel events reduced recurrence of similar medication errors. Although the time and cost required for this intervention is not insignificant, the cumulative benefit to patients, healthcare professionals, and the organization are greater.
Insights
A mini root cause analysis (mini-RCA²) effectively reduced medication error recurrence by providing a structured review process. This quality improvement initiative demonstrated significant benefits for patient safety and healthcare organizations, despite associated time and costs.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Patient Safety
- Medication Error Analysis
Background:
- Full root cause analysis (RCA) is resource-intensive for sentinel events.
- A need exists for efficient methods to address less severe medication errors.
- Quality improvement projects can adapt RCA for broader application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a mini root cause analysis (mini-RCA²) process for medication errors causing harm but not sentinel events.
- To determine the impact of mini-RCA² on the recurrence of similar medication errors.
- To estimate the time and labor costs associated with the mini-RCA² intervention.
Main Methods:
- A mini root cause analysis (mini-RCA²) process was implemented for medication errors causing harm (excluding sentinel events).
- The incidence of similar medication errors was compared before and after the mini-RCA² implementation.
- Data was collected from a safety reporting system, and costs were estimated.
Main Results:
- Seven medication errors were investigated, identifying 39 system failures and leading to 42 recommendations (22 implemented).
- Recurrence of similar harm events reduced from 7 (0.11%) to 0 (p=0.016), with full implementation yielding a reduction from 9 (0.21%) to 0 (p=0.007).
- The intervention required 251 hours and cost SAR 34,181 (US $8256).
Conclusions:
- Mini-RCA² offers a structured, efficient process for managing and reducing medication errors.
- The intervention successfully decreased the recurrence of similar medication errors, enhancing patient safety.
- Despite resource investment, the benefits of mini-RCA² outweigh the costs for healthcare organizations.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...

