Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Neck neoplasms: MR imaging. Part I. Initial evaluation.

H S Glazer, J H Niemeyer, D M Balfe

    Radiology
    |August 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology - Veterinary Extension.

    Zoonoses and public health·2016
    Same author

    Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Veterinary Extension.

    Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2016
    Same author

    Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology - Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement.

    Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2016
    Same author

    Methods and processes of developing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology - veterinary (STROBE-Vet) statement.

    Preventive veterinary medicine·2016
    Same author

    Expert Opinion to Identify High-Risk Entry Routes of Canine Rabies into Papua New Guinea.

    Zoonoses and public health·2016
    Same author

    Epidemiology and clinical presentation of canine distemper disease in dogs and ferrets in Australia, 2006-2014.

    Australian veterinary journal·2016
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a promising tool for evaluating neck neoplasms, often outperforming computed tomography (CT) in visualizing tumor-to-muscle relationships. MR excels in demonstrating vascular anatomy, especially without contrast, though CT remains better for bone and cartilage details.

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Oncology
    • Medical Imaging

    Background:

    • Neck neoplasms encompass tumors of the oropharynx, supraglottic area, carotid body, thyroid, and malignant lymphadenopathy.
    • Accurate imaging is crucial for staging and treatment planning of these complex tumors.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in assessing untreated neck neoplasms.
    • To compare MR imaging findings with computed tomography (CT) scans for neck tumor evaluation.

    Main Methods:

    • Twenty-three patients with untreated neck neoplasms underwent MR imaging.
    • Twenty of these patients also had CT scans for comparative analysis.
    • Image sequences (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, balanced) were analyzed for contrast and anatomical detail.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • MR imaging demonstrated superior tumor-to-muscle relationship visualization compared to CT.
    • T1-weighted images best distinguished tumor from fat; T2-weighted images best separated tumor from muscle.
    • Balanced MR sequences offered optimal overall image quality and vascular anatomy depiction.
    • CT was more effective for evaluating bone, cartilage, and airway abnormalities.

    Conclusions:

    • MR imaging is a valuable and promising technique for evaluating neck neoplasms, particularly for soft tissue and vascular assessment.
    • A combination of MR and CT may be optimal for comprehensive evaluation of neck tumors, leveraging the strengths of each modality.