Needle Aspiration Versus Catheter Drainage in Medium-Sized (5-10 cm) Liver Abscesses: A Comparative Study in Mumbai,

Solai Muthu Rajagopal S1, Girish Bakhshi1, Gayatri A Muley1

  • 1General Surgery, Grant Government Medical College and Research Institute, Mumbai, IND.

Cureus
|June 1, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration for moderate liver abscesses leads to less pain, shorter hospital stays, and quicker return to work compared to catheter drainage. This makes it a preferred initial interventional treatment, especially in developing nations.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Interventional Radiology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Liver abscess is an ancient disease with significant mortality.
  • Interventional drainage has improved outcomes, but the best method for medium-sized abscesses remains debated, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare ultrasound-guided needle aspiration with catheter drainage for moderate-sized liver abscesses.
  • To evaluate outcomes including pain, hospital stay, work leave, and recurrence.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized study of 60 patients with moderate (5-10 cm) liver abscesses.
  • Patients were divided into two groups: needle aspiration or catheter drainage, with identical medical treatment.
  • Outcomes measured included analgesic use, hospital stay duration, work leave duration, and recurrence rates.

Main Results:

  • Both groups had comparable success rates (80% vs. 84%).
  • Needle aspiration significantly reduced analgesic requirements, hospital stay (9.3 vs. 14.8 days), and work leave (18.9 vs. 32.5 days) (p<0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Percutaneous needle aspiration is a primary interventional treatment for moderate-sized liver abscesses.
  • Further multicentric randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings.