Visual impairment due to retinopathy of prematurity and concomitant disabilities in the Netherlands

Kasia Trzcionkowska1, Jacqueline U M Termote2, Maria M van Genderen3

  • 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

PubMed

Insights

Visual impairment from retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) did not increase between 2009-2018, even with earlier births. Strict screening criteria ensured no infants were missed for ROP detection.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neonatology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of visual impairment in premature infants.
  • Changes in neonatal care, including lower gestational age limits and higher oxygen saturation targets, may impact ROP incidence and severity.
  • Updated screening criteria for ROP were implemented in 2013.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the incidence of visual impairment due to ROP and associated disabilities in the Netherlands from 2009 to 2018.
  • To compare current ROP incidence with historical data.
  • To monitor the effectiveness of ROP screening following the adoption of stricter criteria.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of anonymous data from 53 infants diagnosed with ROP.
  • Data collected included visual acuity, ROP treatment, and a range of concomitant disabilities.
  • Study period coincided with implementation of lower age limits for neonatal support (2010) and higher oxygen saturation targets (2014).

Main Results:

  • Visual impairment incidence due to ROP was 2.02 per 100,000 live births.
  • A significant decrease in ROP-related visual impairment was observed compared to earlier periods (1975-2000).
  • Concomitant disabilities remained stable, while mean gestational age decreased to 26.6 weeks.

Conclusions:

  • The incidence of visual impairment from ROP and associated disabilities has not increased between 2009 and 2018.
  • Despite changes in neonatal care (lower GA, higher O2 saturation), ROP screening effectiveness was maintained.
  • No infants were missed for ROP screening after the implementation of more restrictive inclusion criteria.
Abstract