Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Comparing Patient and Provider Priorities Around Amputation Level Outcomes Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
Diana Poehler1, Joseph Czerniecki2, Daniel Norvell3
1Advanced Methods Development, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC; Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Patients undergoing lower-limb amputation value limb preservation and mobility differently than providers. Understanding these differences can improve shared decision-making for amputation levels.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics and Rehabilitation
- Vascular Surgery
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Chronic limb-threatening ischemia often necessitates transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) or transtibial amputation (TTA).
- TMA preserves more limb and potentially enhances mobility but carries a higher risk of healing complications and further surgeries.
- Discrepancies in prioritizing amputation outcomes between patients and providers can impact functional results and shared decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare patient priorities with provider perceptions of patient priorities in amputation level decision-making.
- To utilize Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to quantify and compare these priorities.
Main Methods:
- Employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) MCDA method for its low cognitive burden and ease of implementation.
- Included five key criteria: ability to walk, surgical healing, rehabilitation intensity, limb length, and prosthetic/orthotic device usability.
- Recruited a national sample of dysvascular lower-limb amputees and healthcare providers from the Veterans Health Administration for online and telephonic surveys.
Main Results:
- Twenty-six patients and 38 providers participated; 50% of patients had undergone TMA, and 50% had TTA.
- Patients prioritized TMA higher (72%) than providers (63%).
- Key outcome priorities differed: patients valued walking (47%) and prosthesis use (17%) more, while providers emphasized healing (28%).
Conclusions:
- Provider perceptions generally aligned with patient preferences regarding amputation level but showed variability in the importance assigned to specific outcomes.
- Identified differences in patient values and provider perceptions highlight the need for enhanced shared decision-making strategies.
- Integrating the MCDA framework into decision aids could facilitate more effective patient-provider discussions regarding amputation choices.
More Related Videos
09:01Treatment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Total Ankle Replacement Through a Lateral Transfibular Approach
Published on: January 24, 2018
09:51The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Ethical Dilemmas II
Peripheral Artery Disease IV: Nursing Management
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: