Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

05:15
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
Published on: February 19, 2018
10.9K
Optimized experimental designs to best detect spatial positional association of response codes in working memory
Morgane Ftaïta1, Maëliss Vivion1, Emilie Banks1
1BCL, CNRS, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|June 1, 2023
Summary
The Spatial Positional Association of Response Codes (SPoARC) effect, or spatialization in working memory, is best detected with a single probe. Stimulus type (verbal vs. visual) did not impact this spatial mapping.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human Memory
Background:
- The SPoARC effect describes how information is spatialized in working memory.
- Understanding factors influencing this spatial mapping is crucial for cognitive models.
- Previous research has explored various factors, but the interplay between stimulus modality and probe presentation requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of stimulus type (verbal vs. visual) and the number of probes on the SPoARC effect.
- To determine if spatialization in working memory is modulated by whether participants process verbal or visual information.
- To examine how the presentation of single versus multiple probes affects the detection of the SPoARC effect.
Main Methods:
- 137 participants memorized sequences of words or pictures.
- A recognition test was administered using lateralized keys.
- Participants were divided into two groups: one receiving a single probe, the other receiving multiple probes after each sequence.
Main Results:
- A significantly greater number of participants exhibited the SPoARC effect when presented with a single probe.
- No significant difference in the SPoARC effect was found between participants who memorized words versus pictures.
- The findings suggest that spatialization is more readily detected under conditions of a single scan or probe.
Conclusions:
- The SPoARC effect is more reliably detected when working memory sequences are scanned once, as indicated by the single-probe condition.
- The modality of stimuli (verbal vs. visual) does not appear to influence the spatial mapping of information in working memory.
- Further research is needed to clarify the distinct roles of verbalization and visualization in the manifestation of the SPoARC effect.

