Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Pathophysiology of Heart Failure01:17

Pathophysiology of Heart Failure

1.7K
Heart failure (HF) is a progressive syndrome involving ventricles that leads to inadequate cardiac output. It can be classified based on location and output or ejection fraction. Ejection fraction (EF) is an essential measurement in the diagnosis and surveillance of HF. Reduced EF corresponds to systolic heart failure (HFrEF). However, HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is becoming increasingly prevalent. Also known as diastolic HF, this form of HF is related to aging. The...
1.7K
Heart Failure I: Introduction01:27

Heart Failure I: Introduction

24
Heart failure refers to a clinical syndrome caused by structural or functional cardiac disorders that prevent the heart from pumping an adequate amount of blood to meet the body's metabolic needs. This condition often arises from myocardial infarction or ischemia, leading to decreased cardiac output, reduced tissue perfusion, impaired gas exchange, fluid volume imbalance, and decreased functional ability.Heart failure can result from disruptions in the mechanisms that regulate cardiac output...
24
Factors Influencing Heart Rate01:30

Factors Influencing Heart Rate

2.9K
The heart rate, or pulse rate, is a vital indicator of cardiovascular health. It reflects the number of times the heart beats per minute. Various physiological and environmental factors influence heart rate, increasing or decreasing cardiac output. Understanding these factors is crucial for assessing heart function and identifying potential health issues.
Let us explore the significant factors affecting heart rate, including age, body temperature, posture, acute pain, chemical influences,...
2.9K
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation01:30

Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

21
Heart failure can be classified in various ways, with the most common classifications based on physical activity limitations, disease progression, severity, and treatment strategies.The Functional Classification of Heart Failure divides patients into four categories based on physical activity limitation due to symptom burden.Class I: Patients in this class have cardiac disease but no physical activity limitations. Ordinary activities like walking, climbing stairs, or routine tasks do not cause...
21
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance01:29

Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance

713
Typical heart performance is influenced by heart rate, rhythm, myocardial contraction, and metabolism or blood flow. The cardiac muscle exhibits distinct electrophysiological features, including pacemaker activity and calcium channel control, which play a vital role in the heart's response to various drugs. The autonomic nervous system, comprising the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches, regulates heart rate. Sympathetic activation increases heart rate, while parasympathetic activation...
713
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology01:29

Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

16
Systolic Heart Failure and Compensatory MechanismsSystolic heart failure (also termed HFrEF, Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction) is the most prevalent type of heart filure. It results in a decreased volume of blood being pumped from the ventricle. The aortic arch and carotid sinuses have baroreceptors that detect reduced blood pressure, triggering the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) to release epinephrine and norepinephrine. Initially, this response aims to boost heart rate and...
16

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Amiodarone-related thyroid dysfunction and associated outcomes in patients with heart failure-A nationwide cohort study.

Journal of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Kidney function and acid-base status as gatekeepers of natriuretic and diuretic responsiveness in chronic HF: insights from the DEA-HF clinical trial.

European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy·2026
Same author

Clinical trials for continuously monitored and updated AI systems.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Seasonal variation in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular hospitalizations across climatic zones in Northern and Southern Israel.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2026
Same author

DUDE: deep unsupervised domain adaptation using variable nEighbors for physiological time series analysis.

Physiological measurement·2025
Same author

Efficacy of ambulatory intravenous diuresis for chronic heart failure patients: Insights from the DEA-HF trial.

ESC heart failure·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

6.5K

What drives performance in machine learning models for predicting heart failure outcome?

Rom Gutman1, Doron Aronson2,3, Oren Caspi2,3

  • 1William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

European Heart Journal. Digital Health
|June 2, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Accurate prediction of acute heart failure (AHF) prognosis relies more on the number and type of patient data used than the specific machine learning model. Utilizing comprehensive data improves risk stratification for AHF patients.

More Related Videos

A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
07:09

A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs

Published on: February 18, 2022

1.9K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:15

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

144

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
09:20

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Published on: February 13, 2021

6.5K
A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs
07:09

A Surgical Model of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in Tibetan Minipigs

Published on: February 18, 2022

1.9K
Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
05:15

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Published on: June 10, 2025

144

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Acute heart failure (AHF) presents a critical juncture with poor prognosis.
  • Current risk-stratification tools at hospital discharge are inadequate for tailored treatment.
  • Machine learning offers potential for improved AHF risk prediction using complex patient data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify key factors driving success in AHF prediction models.
  • To develop an AI-based prediction model tailored to a specific institution for real-time clinical decision support.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 10,868 AHF patients over 12 years was analyzed.
  • 372 covariates were collected from admission through hospitalization.
  • Seven machine learning models were evaluated, including logistic regression, random forest, Cox, XGBoost, NeuralNet, and an ensemble model.
  • Model performance was assessed based on prediction method and covariate type/number, with 1-year survival as the primary outcome.

Main Results:

  • Most models achieved >80% prediction accuracy (AUROC).
  • The ensemble model showed slightly superior performance (81.2% AUROC).
  • The number and type of covariates significantly impacted prediction success (P < 0.001), with multiplex-covariates outperforming traditional clinical variables (80.4% vs. 77.8% AUROC).
  • Demographics, lab tests, and administrative data provided the most significant performance gains.

Conclusions:

  • The selection of predictive modeling method is less critical than the multiplicity and type of covariates used for AHF prognosis.
  • Structured data preprocessing and the use of multiple covariates yield accurate, institution-specific risk predictions for AHF.