Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2025

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: July 24, 2019
A smartphone-based tapping task as a marker of medication response in Parkinson's disease: a proof of concept study
Sanne Broeder1, George Roussos2, Joni De Vleeschhauwer3
1KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Neurorehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), Tervuursevest 101, 3001, Leuven, Belgium. sannebroeder@live.com.
Abstract:
Tapping tasks have the potential to distinguish between ON-OFF fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD) possibly aiding assessment of medication status in e-diaries and research. This proof of concept study aims to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a smartphone-based tapping task (developed as part of the cloudUPDRS-project) to discriminate between ON-OFF used in the home setting without supervision. 32 PD patients performed the task before their first medication intake, followed by two test sessions after 1 and 3 h. Testing was repeated for 7 days. Index finger tapping between two targets was performed as fast as possible with each hand. Self-reported ON-OFF status was also indicated. Reminders were sent for testing and medication intake. We studied task compliance, objective performance (frequency and inter-tap distance), classification accuracy and repeatability of tapping. Average compliance was 97.0% (± 3.3%), but 16 patients (50%) needed remote assistance. Self-reported ON-OFF scores and objective tapping were worse pre versus post medication intake (p < 0.0005). Repeated tests showed good to excellent test-retest reliability in ON (0.707 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.975). Although 7 days learning effects were apparent, ON-OFF differences remained. Discriminative accuracy for ON-OFF was particularly good for right-hand tapping (0.72 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.80). Medication dose was associated with ON-OFF tapping changes. Unsupervised tapping tests performed on a smartphone have the potential to classify ON-OFF fluctuations in the home setting, despite some learning and time effects. Replication of these results are needed in a wider sample of patients.

