Clinical Implications of Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Minjae Yoon1,2, Jaewon Oh1, Kyeong-Hyeon Chun3
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Device-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is linked to reduced optimal biventricular pacing and poorer clinical outcomes compared to patients without AF.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) diminishes the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared to sinus rhythm (SR).
- Optimal biventricular (BiV) pacing is crucial for CRT success, but AF can impede it, negatively impacting patient outcomes.
- Investigating the impact of device-detected AF on BiV pacing and clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients undergoing CRT is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the association between device-detected AF and optimal BiV pacing in HF patients treated with CRT.
- To determine the effect of device-detected AF on clinical outcomes, including heart failure hospitalizations and mortality.
- To compare outcomes between patients with and without device-detected AF post-CRT implantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 174 patients who received CRT between 2012 and 2019.
- Definition of optimal BiV pacing as ≥98% and device-detected AF as atrial high-rate episodes ≥180 bpm for >6 minutes.
- Stratification of patients without pre-existing AF into device-detected AF and no-AF groups for comparison.
Main Results:
- Among 120 patients without pre-existing AF, 15.8% developed device-detected AF.
- Optimal BiV pacing was significantly lower in the device-detected AF group (42.1%) versus the no-AF group (75.2%).
- The device-detected AF group experienced higher rates of HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death.
Conclusions:
- Device-detected AF in HF patients with CRT is associated with suboptimal BiV pacing.
- This suboptimal pacing in the presence of device-detected AF correlates with worse clinical outcomes.
- These findings highlight the importance of monitoring and managing AF in CRT recipients.
Background And Objectives:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with decreased cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits compared to sinus rhythm (SR). Effective biventricular (BiV) pacing is a determinant of CRT success, but AF can interfere with adequate BiV pacing and affect clinical outcomes. We investigated the effect of device-detected AF on clinical outcomes and optimal BiV pacing in patients with heart failure (HF) treated with CRT.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 174 patients who underwent CRT implantation between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary center. The optimal BiV pacing percentage was defined as ≥98%. Device-detected AF was defined as an atrial high-rate episode ≥180 beats per minute lasting more than 6 minutes during the follow-up period. We stratified the patients without preexisting AF at pre-implantation into device-detected AF and no-AF groups.
Results:
A total of 120 patients did not show preexisting AF at pre-implantation, and 54 had AF. Among these 120 patients, 19 (15.8%) showed device-detected AF during a median follow-up of 25.1 months. The proportion of optimal BiV pacing was significantly lower in the device-detected AF group than in the no-AF group (42.1% vs. 75.2%, p=0.009). The device-detected AF group had a higher incidence of HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death than the no-AF group. The device-detected AF and previous AF groups showed no significant differences regarding the percentage of BiV pacing and clinical outcomes.
Conclusions:
For HF patients implanted with CRT, device-detected AF was associated with lower optimal BiV pacing and worse clinical outcomes than no-AF.
More Related Videos
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow...
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
