Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Creation of a Prototype Cochlear Training Model.

The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·2024
Same author

Pediatric Thyroid Nodules: Ultrasound Characteristics as Indicators of Malignancy.

OTO open·2022
Same author

Clinical Guidelines in Pediatric Hearing Loss: Systemic Review Using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument.

The Laryngoscope·2018
Same author

Cochlear implant provider awareness of vaccination guidelines.

The Laryngoscope·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K

Complications of cochlear implants: a MAUDE database study.

S Jinka1, S Wase1, A Jeyakumar1,2

  • 1Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA.

The Journal of Laryngology and Otology
|June 6, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Cochlear implant complications vary by manufacturer. Advanced Bionics (manufacturer C) showed higher rates of infection, CSF leak, extrusion, and facial nerve stimulation, while Med-El (manufacturer B) had higher meningitis rates.

Keywords:
Cochlear implantationclinical auditcochlear implantsevidence-based medicinefacial nerve

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

859
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation
03:49

Author Spotlight: Optimizing EAS with Long Electrodes for Enhanced Cochlear Coverage and Hearing Preservation

Published on: October 11, 2024

859
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.0K

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Safety

Background:

  • Cochlear implantation is a complex procedure with potential complications.
  • Understanding manufacturer-specific complication profiles is crucial for informed decision-making.

Conclusions:

  • Manufacturer-specific data on cochlear implant complications can enhance pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative awareness.
  • Considering patient risk factors alongside manufacturer data can improve surgical outcomes and patient safety.